Student Agency is More Than Voice and Choice

Educators and schools across the globe have embraced the concept of student agency.  It is a relatively simple concept in theory, but much more difficult to implement in practice.  The underlying premise is to move learners from a state of engagement to empowerment so that they exert more ownership over their learning.  For many schools, this flies in the face of a traditional schooling mindset that was more geared to learners having to buy-in to a one-size-fits-all system where success was determined by how well everyone did under the same conditions more or less. Oh, wait…. this is still the case in many schools. I digress. A culture that embraces student agency promotes risk-taking while working to remove the fear of failure helps students develop a growth mindset, and has students applying what they have learned in real-world contexts as opposed to just in the classroom.

Student agency is all about improving the learning experience for kids. The most common strategy that is embraced in schools is empowering learners through voice and choice.  This could come in the form of kids selecting the right tool for the right task to demonstrate conceptual mastery or choosing where to sit in a classroom with flexible seating.  It might be facilitated by posing questions and then having students respond under cover of anonymity using mobile devices.  Or maybe it is combining both elements of voice and choice through pedagogically sound blended learning activities. Learning in and out of the classroom should always be at the forefront when it comes to agency. However, we must not lose sight of the third element that comprises this concept, and that is advocacy.

Image credit: https://addictionandrecoverynews.wordpress.com/

While voice and choice are more aligned with ownership of learning in the classroom, advocacy aligns with improving the school or district culture.  Learners should be in a position to advocate for ideas, strategies, resources, and other elements that will help them succeed. This is not a new concept in any sense.  Adam Fletcher writes:

Student advocacy has a long history going back to at least the 1930s when a youth-led group called the American Youth Congress presented a list of grievances to the US Congress including public education. Through the Civil Rights movement of the 1950s to the free expression movement of the 1960s to the resurgence in student voice in the 2000s, student education advocacy is alive in the US today. 

Meaningful student involvement engages students as education advocates to work within the education system and throughout the community to change schools. Many students participate in committees, on unique panels, and in functions that help raise awareness or interest in education issues.

How would you rate the level of learner advocacy in your school or district?  This was one of my main focus areas as a principal.  Every month I convened all elected members of student government and engaged them in a conversation as to how they wanted to improve their school. The discussion was relatively broad, focusing on anything related to academic, social, and emotional ideas for growth and improvement. My only request was that each idea or suggestion was accompanied with practical strategies for implementation. After each meeting, I emailed detailed minutes and provided regular updates on where some of their well-articulated suggestions stood. The best part for these students was when my admin team and I implemented some of their excellent ideas.  There is no point in student advocacy if no action results.  Schools with vibrant learning cultures recognize this fact.  Below are some other ideas to think about when it comes to empowering student advocacy, the majority of which were implemented in my former school.

• When hiring new teachers and administrators include students on the panel for the first round of interviews.
• If you make a move to Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) or 1:1 elicit input from students when crafting policies and expectations.
• To start the school year, allow students to co-create classroom rules.
• When looking to improve divisive topics such as grading and homework allow students to weigh in and offer suggestions.
• Empower students to use social media and the school newspaper or magazine to engage in respectful dialogue about how to improve culture.
• As you either create or refine your makerspace, gather student input on what themes, tools, and technology they would like to have
• Ensure there is a student representative to the local Board of Education (BOE) and Parent Teacher Organization (PTO)

Student agency can be a powerful force in education.  It can increase the degree of autonomy and self-determination amongst our learners while also engaging them in activities which aim to influence decisions in a school or district. How are or will you integrate more opportunities for advocacy to create a learning culture that prioritizes all elements of student agency?

Below is my video reflection on this topic.

Student Agency: Moving From Talk to Action

When I reflect back on what we were able to accomplish at New Milford High School, I am overtaken by a great sense of pride. We were able to transform the learning culture of a traditional school and in the process got results while becoming an example that others emulated. This was achieved during a time of tumultuous change as the education reform movement was just gaining steam. Even when doubt entered out minds, which it always does when change is involved, we persevered as a school community thanks to a unified vision that we could better serve our students.  

In a sense, all of our major changes really started when we began involving our students in the process. This was also the reason, in my opinion, as to why change became sustainable.  More often than not change is orchestrated and directed at the adult level. There is often a great deal of talk about how many changes are being spearheaded for the betterment of students, but rarely are the students themselves asked for their input or unique ideas.  Schools need to work for our students, as they are our number one stakeholder and ultimate boss. 

Image credit: https://andrewherrick.files.wordpress.com

If we are to improve learning and ultimately school-based outcomes student agency needs to be a real element of school culture. Student agency is about empowering kids to own their learning (and school) through greater autonomy. It is driven by choice, voice, and advocacy.  We learned a great deal about student agency during our school transformation. Below are a few practical tips to make student agency a reality in your classroom, school, or district:

• Develop pedagogically sound learning activities with standards-aligned assessments and allow students to select the right tool for the task to demonstrate conceptual mastery 
• Allow students to co-create rules and expectations.
• Provide avenues for students to provide honest feedback on school culture. I held monthly meetings with all members of school government across all grade levels giving them an open forum to provide improvement ideas. We also set up an Edmodo group to continue the conversation. The key, however, was the follow-up and implementation on some of the ideas suggested. Tools like TodaysMeet and Mentimeter can also be used to gather perception data from kids 
• Implement portfolios as a means of authentic assessment 
• When hiring new teachers and administrators have kids on the interview committee
• As policies that impact students are created or updated (i.e. BYOD, 1;1, grading, homework, technology purchases, space renovations, etc.) provide a forum for kids to give feedback 
• Integrate personalized and personal learning pathways such as blended and virtual
• Have protocols established for students to suggest new courses and extra-curricular activities
• Implement Academies or Smaller Learning Communities (SLC’s)
• Let students select books for independent reading based on their interests and reading level

Image credit: Jackie Gerstein

Above are some of the ways we increase student agency. What would you add? Please share some of your ideas in the comments below.

Meaningful change must begin with active student involvement. Advocacy, choice, and voice should occur in the classroom as well as the school setting. Relevancy and value on the part of our learners are central elements to success. Let’s move away from the catchy sound bites and clichés and begin to implement real strategies that will better prepare students for an ever-changing world. 

The Personalized Learning Empowerment Framework

I have been sharing on this blog insights on personalization for the past sixteen (16) years. During my years as a principal, we emphasized a shift from “what” to “who” to help students take greater ownership of their learning.  From using Poll Everywhere to amplify student voice, to flipped lessons in math, and creating the Academies at NMHS, our goal was to create experiences that our students valued and would ultimately improve outcomes, which it did. The journey, however, was anything but easy. 

Moving from a culture of compliance to one of empowerment is the greatest challenge and opportunity facing educational leaders today. For years, our systems have been designed for standardization, often treating students as passive recipients of information rather than active drivers of their own learning. However, as we discussed in our book Personalize, the shift toward personalized learning is not just about technology; it is about pedagogy and the intentional design of experiences that foster agency, mastery, and purpose. Below is our definition:

"Pesonalized learning is all students getting what they need when and where they need it to learn."

The Personalized Learning Empowerment Framework provides a roadmap for this transformation. It moves beyond the "what" of personalization and dives deep into the "how" by focusing on a continuous cycle of growth. By centering the learner, we can ensure that every student has the support they need to succeed in an ever-changing world.

1. Assess and Understand: The Foundation

Effective personalization begins with a deep understanding of who the learner is. We cannot tailor instruction if we do not first establish a clear picture of a student’s strengths, needs, and aspirations. This extends well beyond traditional standardized test data. We must utilize holistic diagnostics that account for social-emotional well-being, cognitive processing, and personal interests.

A critical component of this phase is creating a learner profile. When students document how they learn best, they begin to take ownership of their educational journey. This process is supported by continuous feedback loops that provide real-time insights into student progress. Research indicates that when assessment is used formatively to understand learner variability, it significantly enhances the teacher's ability to provide targeted support (Papadakis et al., 2021). By building this foundation, we move away from a one-size-fits-all diagnostic approach and toward a more human-centered understanding of excellence.

2. Plan and Tailor: The Strategy

Once the foundation is set, the focus shifts to strategic design. Planning in a personalized environment is a collaborative effort between the educator and the student. Co-constructed goals ensure learning objectives are relevant to the student while meeting rigorous academic standards. This partnership is essential for developing student agency, as it gives learners a voice in determining their path to mastery.

Tailoring the strategy requires a commitment to flexible pathways and varied pacing. Not every student needs the same amount of time to master a concept, nor should they all be required to demonstrate their learning in the same way. Providing multiple entry points and methods for demonstrating competency helps create a more equitable classroom environment. Evidence suggests that flexible learning pathways that prioritize student choice lead to higher levels of engagement and cognitive investment (Bernacki et al., 2021). At this stage, the teacher shifts from a dispenser of knowledge to an architect of learning experiences.

3. Engage and Facilitate: The Action

This is where the framework comes to life in the classroom. Engagement is not just about keeping students busy; it is about active learning that challenges students cognitively and keeps them physically engaged. Facilitation involves a delicate balance of targeted instruction, where the teacher works with small groups or individuals based on data, and the use of adaptive tools that provide personalized practice.

In a facilitated environment, the teacher monitors the room, providing "just-in-time" support rather than "just-in-case" lectures. This transition to active learning models encourages students to solve complex problems and collaborate with peers. Studies have shown that technology-enhanced personalized instruction, when combined with strong teacher facilitation, leads to improved outcomes in both literacy and mathematics (Major et al., 2021). The goal is to create a high-energy environment in which the "heavy lifting" of learning is shifted from the teacher to the student.

4. Reflect and Refine: The Growth Loop

The final, and perhaps most important, element of the framework is the growth loop. Learning is not a linear process with a fixed ending; it is a cycle of continuous improvement. Structured reflection enables students to review their work, identify what went well, and determine where they need to improve. This metacognitive practice is what ultimately leads to self-directed learning.

Refinement is also about data-driven adjustments. As students progress through competency-based pathways, they should advance only after demonstrating a genuine understanding of the material. This ensures that no student is left behind due to gaps in foundational knowledge. Research highlights that systematic reflection and the use of data to adjust instructional goals are vital for sustaining long-term academic growth in personalized settings (Walkington & Bernacki, 2020). By closing the loop, we prepare students not only for the next grade level but also for a lifetime of learning and adaptation.

The Personalized Learning Empowerment Framework is more than a conceptual model; it is a catalyst for a systemic shift toward a more human-centered, effective approach to education. By moving beyond the traditional barriers of "one-size-fits-all" instruction, this framework honors every student's unique identity and provides a scalable roadmap for developing true learner agency. When we commit to this continuous cycle of assessment, strategic planning, active facilitation, and purposeful reflection, we do more than just improve test scores. We cultivate the mastery and purpose students need to navigate a complex future. My hope is that this framework empowers educators to stop managing compliance and start inspiring the self-directed, lifelong learners our world desperately needs.

Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2021). Mobile technology applications in contexts of formal and informal learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1437-1441.

Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The impact of technology-enhanced personalized learning on student outcomes: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 635-664.

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Role of Cognitive Load and Individual Differences. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 257-292.

Sheninger, E. C., & Slaugh, N. (2024). Personalize: Meeting the needs of all learners. ConnectEDD Publishing.

Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising evidence-based practices in personalized learning: A review of cognitive and social perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 156-171.

Ditch the Drill and Choose to Thrill: Personalization with Student Choice

There is a saying out there that I hear often: learning is learning. While I don’t discount this view, I firmly believe there is so much to it at the individual level. Preferences and experiences play a significant role in how we all learn, and interests do as well. When asked to do the same thing at the same time in the same way, it is pretty much a fact that a few people will thrive, some will get by, and others will struggle. While this notion challenges the status quo and how things have been done traditionally in education, it is the truth. The question now becomes, what are we going to do about it?

Learners have different learning needs and preferences. Herein lies the power of veering away from approaches focusing on just one way.  Nicki Slaugh and I shared the following in our book Personalize:

Personalized learning compromises an array of strategies where all students get what they need when and where they need it to learn. It’s not about more work. On the contrary, it is about maximizing the time with students prioritizing their needs, resulting in better work.

Agency in the classroom is about giving students more control over their learning through greater autonomy and purpose. Many factors drive it, but the underlying premise is to move learners from a state of engagement to empowerment so that they exert more ownership over their learning. While there are many high-agency strategies to choose from when personalizing, choice stands out. It allows for the tailoring of the learning experience to student needs and strengths, leading to better retention and deeper learning through the following:

• Increased Engagement: When learners have a choice in what they learn or how they learn it, they become more invested in the process. This intrinsic motivation leads to deeper engagement and a stronger desire to understand the material.
• Ownership and Agency: Choice fosters a sense of ownership over the learning process. Learners feel empowered to make decisions and explore topics that interest them. This sense of agency increases their responsibility for their learning and makes them more likely to take initiative.
• Active Exploration: Having choices encourages learners to explore different approaches, materials, or activities. This active exploration allows them to discover new information, make connections between ideas, and solidify their understanding. 

In a science class studying the human body, a teacher wants students to demonstrate their understanding of the digestive system. Traditionally, this could mean assigning a written report or a diagram labeling the organs. However, here is where incorporating student choice can personalize learning through different ways to demonstrate understanding:

• Art: One student who excels in art chooses to create a comic strip explaining the journey of a hamburger through the digestive system. This allows them to showcase their artistic skills while demonstrating their understanding of the different organs involved and their functions.
• Technology: Another student is passionate about technology and chooses to create a stop-motion animation video depicting the digestive process. This student gets to combine their love for technology with their understanding of science.
• Performance: A student who thrives on public speaking chooses to write and perform a short play where the different organs of the digestive system come to life and explain their roles. This allows them to demonstrate their knowledge creatively.

These are just a few examples; a teacher might provide additional options or let students develop their own ideas as long as they meet the learning objectives. The key is that students can choose a method that resonates with them and allows them to showcase their understanding effectively and enjoyably.

Recently, on my podcast, I discussed how choice can be a great differentiator that helps meet the needs of all learners.  There are natural connections to differentiation. Below are the three components and some of the strategies Nicki and I go into detail about in Personalize: 

1. Choice in content: Students can choose to learn the content with the teacher in small groups or independently through a flipped lesson or self-pacing task (reading, video, notes, slides, etc.). No matter the path chosen, checks for understanding along the way inform the student of their understanding. 
2. Choice in the process: Students can choose scaffolded and relevant tasks to complete in a must-do/may-do format, choice board, or playlist. While they work, the teacher uses data or evidence to pull individuals for intensive support.
3. Choice in product: With a well-designed rubric, students choose how to demonstrate learning through creating a product.  For examples, click HERE and HERE. 

Overall, choice empowers learners, personalizes the experience, and fosters a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

Take a deep dive into personalized learning by grabbing your copy of Personalize: Meeting the Needs of All Learners on Amazon. 

Agency: Important for Students and Educators

There is a great deal of talk and focus on the need to improve student agency in our schools and rightfully so (see my post on this topic HERE).  Empowerment and ownership need and should be associated with learning to increase relevancy, value, meaning, and outcomes.  The desire to increase agency in the form of voice, choice, and advocacy should be viewed as just as important for educators (teachers and administrators) as it is for students.  For sustainable change and innovative practices to take hold let’s evaluate the level of educator agency in our schools. 

Image credit: www.peoplematters.in

Voice

Educators, both teachers and administrators, should have a say in many elements that influence a school’s learning culture.  When we don’t listen to the ideas and concerns of others people will shut down and withdraw. This results in a negative impact on motivation, respect, enthusiasm and a willingness to innovate.  In terms of communication, the aspect of listening is just as important in leading and sustaining change as the use of verbal and non-verbal strategies.  Educator voice can be cultivated using the following strategies:

• Flipped staff meetings – Everyone who plans a meeting works terribly hard to develop and then get through an agenda.  This results in a death-by-meeting scenario and is a main reason why most people hate meetings. Consider developing a meeting agenda using Google Docs. The added bonus here is that other documents, images, and videos can be embedded, which really creates a more dynamic agenda.  Complete this a week prior and then send out to your staff where they can add comments and content to the agenda.  Then during the actual meeting focus on one or two very important goals such as the following: How do we improve learning for our students? Have a back channel established and monitored using a tool like TodaysMeet to take educator voice to the next level.  Creating a trusting environment where staff can respond under the cover of anonymity amplifies voice even more.   
• Planning professional learning – How many of us dreaded professional development (PD) days? Historically PD has always been something that was done to us, not something that we wanted to engage in.  The best way to change the paradigm here is to afford educators opportunities to use their voice and ideas to plan powerful learning experiences.  This could consist of speaker recommendations, workshop topics, hosting your own event, or even the development of an unconference.  Just as we want students to own their learning the same should apply to adults. 
• Comment box – This strategy has been used in the hospitality business for ages.  Some people just want their concerns to be heard, but acting on certain concerns can be empowering on many levels.  Consider having some of your talented students create a wood box do this the traditional way and then leave it in the faculty room.  If digital leadership is your thing, set up a few tools (Padlet, TodaysMeet, Tackk) and allow anonymous comments to be posted.  Establish some ground rules prior such as including a solution to go along with the identified problem, as you don’t want this to turn into a gripe session.  The comment box should also be used as an opportunity to provide compliments and positive reinforcement.

Choice

In the classroom, agency empowers a shift where students can choose the right tool for the right task to demonstrate conceptual understanding and mastery. Various pathways to personalize learning and make it more personal are also emphasized.  Educators should have more choice over how they learn themselves. They should also have choice over resources that they, the experts who work with students the most on a day to day basis, feel are valuable to support and enhance learning.  Below are some ideas on how to promote educator choice:

• Micro-credentials – The use of digital badges, otherwise known as micro-credentials, can afford educators choice over what they want to learn about as well as the specific time that they want to learn a new skill or pedagogical technique.  Accountability for learning is ensured through a vetting process and the badge represents the successful achievement of a learning goal. Thanks to the leadership of Laura Fleming we implemented a micro-credential system to acknowledge the informal learning of our teachers and administrators.  You can visit her site HERE and begin to earn your own badges through choice or work to implement your own system.
• Genius Hour - Genius hour is a movement that allows students to explore their own passions and encourages creativity in the classroom.  It provides students a choice in what they learn during a set period of time during school.  This concept can be applied for educators as well.  As principal I created the Professional Growth Period (PGP) where in lieu of a non-instructional duty my staff were given 2-3 forty-eight minute periods per week to follow their learning passions.  A learning portfolio was required as part of this process and presented at the end of year evaluation conference. You can learn more about the PGP process HERE. 
• Distributive budgeting – Distributive leadership conveys the importance of a shared, collective and extended leadership practice that builds the capacity for change and improvement. This can be applied to the budgeting process when it comes time to purchase learning tools, resources, and services (PD providers). The choice factor honors the expertise found in our classrooms and schools and can serve as a great catalyst for sustainable change. 

Advocacy

Educators need to be put in a position where they can actively advocate for system improvements without the fear of repercussion.  It is important to understand that there is no perfect teacher, classroom, administrator, school, district, or system. In education, we must focus on areas where our data tells us we can improve, but also continue to push the envelope by embracing innovative ideas and an edupreneurial mindset (learn more about this concept in my book BrandED). Advocacy educators consider voice and support for a cause to bring about needed change.  Let’s face it, even with progress in schools there still are many areas that need improvement. Forums should be established where advocates for grading, homework, schedule, curriculum, budget, and professional development reform can not only be heard, but also offer recommendations for improvement.  These need to be safe places where open dialogue is encouraged and action results. 

These are my thoughts on improving educator agency in our schools to compliment student agency. When looking at the three essential elements (voice, choice, advocacy) what examples would you add?

Why Non-Negotiables Are the Load-Bearing Walls of School Culture

Few phrases generate as much apprehension as "non-negotiables." For many educators, the phrase evokes images of heavy-handed administrative oversight, restrictive pacing guides, and scripted curricula that sap teachers' autonomy. However, when properly defined and operationalized, non-negotiables are not compliance tools. Instead, they serve as the load-bearing pillars of school culture, safeguarding instructional equity, building interpersonal trust, and establishing collective efficacy among staff.

Without an explicit baseline of shared expectations, schools inadvertently leave student success to chance. Learning outcomes become dependent on which classroom a student is assigned to, while teacher collaboration splinters into isolated silos. To construct an environment where both students and educators thrive, school systems must identify, protect, and sustain explicit non-negotiables across instructional design, classroom culture, and professional community.

The Structural Necessity of Cognitive Lift

Every student deserves daily access to rich, grade-appropriate instruction that maximizes independent thinking. In far too many settings, remediation strategies inadvertently lower academic expectations, creating a systemic barrier where students are continually fed below-grade-level content with excessive teacher hand-holding. Over time, this cumulative deficit widens achievement gaps and deprives students of authentic academic agency.

An instructional non-negotiable ensures that all students engage directly with complex texts, high-level mathematical concepts, and inquiry-based problems, supported by intentional scaffolding rather than reduced cognitive lift. When instructional tasks demand sustained mental effort from the learner, student discourse increases, and critical thinking flourishes. Hattie (2009) showed through extensive meta-analyses that teacher clarity, deliberate scaffolding, and high expectations far outweigh socio-economic indicators in determining student academic growth.

Instructional non-negotiables mandate that the intellectual heavy lifting remains squarely with the student. If an educator dominates classroom discourse, the students become passive observers rather than active sense-makers who generate insights independently. Embedded formative assessment, such as systemic checks for understanding and daily exit tickets, functions as a secondary instructional non-negotiable to gauge that processing. Black and Wiliam (1998) established that responsive formative assessment, when used to immediately adapt classroom instruction to meet student needs, produces some of the largest learning gains observed in educational research. In a system built on non-negotiables, assessing student mastery is not an exercise in grading; it is an uncompromising prerequisite for ensuring authentic cognitive lift occurs in every lesson.

Cultural Consistency as a Conduit for Interpersonal Trust

Cognitive lift cannot exist in a vacuum. It requires an environment underpinned by predictable routines, relational stability, and clear behavioral boundaries. Students encounter varied stressors outside of school, including economic hardship, familial instability, and community trauma. When expectations inside a school building fluctuate unpredictably from period to period, students divert valuable mental energy to navigate ambiguous behavioral rules rather than engage in deep academic thought.

A culture rooted in non-negotiables establishes unwavering routines for classroom transitions, peer interactions, and conflict resolution. When procedures are clear, transparent, and practiced until they become automatic, instructional time is reclaimed and anxiety decreases. Behavioral expectations must be paired with relational warmth and restorative accountability. Consistent behavioral policies foster the interpersonal trust vulnerable students need to embrace cognitive lift and take intellectual risks without fearing failure or ridicule. Wang et al. (1993) identified classroom management, systematic procedures, and positive social interactions as the single most powerful cluster of variables influencing student cognitive and affective learning outcomes. Consistency across classrooms removes arbitrary behavioral penalties and replaces systemic ambiguity with restorative clarity.

Professional Community and Collective Teacher Efficacy

The third pillar of educational non-negotiables addresses the professional habits of the adults in the building. Historically, teaching has been an isolating profession where individuals retreat behind closed classroom doors. This isolation hinders pedagogical improvement and accelerates educator burnout.

To overcome this structural flaw, schools must institute non-negotiables surrounding professional collaboration. Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) cannot simply serve as operational meetings or opportunities to exchange lesson plans. An authentic professional non-negotiable requires educators to regularly bring common assessment data and authentic student work samples to the table, analyze performance discrepancies, and design instructional shifts that protect high cognitive lift collaboratively.

This disciplined, reflective approach directly cultivates collective teacher efficacy, which represents the shared belief among staff that their concerted efforts can overcome learning barriers. Goddard et al. (2000) found that collective teacher efficacy is a significant positive predictor of student achievement across elementary schools, even after controlling for student demographic characteristics. When educators adhere to the non-negotiable practice of analyzing student work and taking shared ownership of grade-level data, professional growth stops being sporadic. Collaboration becomes the catalyst that sustains teacher retention, builds interpersonal trust, and standardizes high levels of cognitive lift across departments.

The Cost of Inconsistency

When fatigue, convenience, or administrative turnover erodes educational non-negotiables, systemic equity fails first. Well-resourced students often have external safety nets, including private tutors and enrichment programs, that insulate them against inconsistent school environments. Conversely, students who rely exclusively on public schools for their academic progress suffer deeply when behavioral expectations fluctuate, cognitive lift is replaced by passive seatwork, and teacher collaboration evaporates.

Non-negotiables are not created to constrict teacher creativity or police compliance. When school leadership and faculty co-design them, they clarify the commitments an institution owes its community. By maintaining a lean, visible set of standards focused on independent student thinking, cultural predictability, and reflective professional inquiry, schools can transform sporadic pockets of individual excellence into an enduring, school-wide reality.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. 

Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507. 

Hattie, J. (2009). The black box of tertiary assessment: An impending revolution. Tertiary Assessment & Higher Education Student Outcomes: Policy, Practice & Research, 1(1), 259–275.

Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294. 

High-Agency in the Remote and Hybrid Classroom

Educators desperately want and need support. They need practical strategies that are not just effective but also can be developed in a reasonable amount of time.  To achieve this goal, we must first examine the foundational elements that lead to successful teaching and learning, whether the environment is remote or hybrid.  In no particular order, these include:

• Maslow before Bloom's (SEL considerations)
• Instructional design grounded in sound pedagogy
• Purposeful use of technology
• Leveraging a learning management system for continuity and cohesiveness
• Equity
• Continuous feedback
• Job-embedded and on-going professional learning

At first glance, one might think that there is a great deal to consider. Under the current circumstances, I would agree. That is why it is not the time to re-create the wheel and work harder. One pitfall is trying to teach traditionally under the current circumstances.  Without a doubt, this will be and has been, more time consuming for educators. So, where do you begin? There are many strategies that educators were implementing well before the pandemic that hold more value now. Regardless of the terminology used, these represent more personalized pathways that focus on student agency leading to empowerment and more ownership of the learning experience. 

I feel the best way to support educators is to show how it can be done under the same conditions by sharing practical examples. For the past two years, I have been blessed to work with the Corinth School District in Mississippi on pedagogy, both digital and non-digital. We have seen incredible growth in all schools across the district through the coaching of both teachers and administrators. With the foundation established last year, they were able to adapt to the current landscape quickly. 

Over the summer, they really ramped up how their LMS (Canvas in their case) would be used K-12 to facilitate their hybrid learning model better. Through the lens of high-agency strategies, I will share some practical strategies that educators can implement right now as well as some examples. 

Voice 

Honoring kids' voices and allowing them to have a say during the learning process is a central tenet of student agency. In many cases, voice can be amplified through the cover of anonymity, which is critical for introverts and shy students. Virtual breakout rooms and digital tools allow all students to respond during reviews of prior learning, checks for understanding, closure activities, and after collaborative activities. I have seen all schools incorporate Zoom breakout rooms in Corinth but was super impressed with the pre-K teachers who used it in conjunction with Nearpod. The elementary teachers are also using both Seesaw and Canvas to promote voice.

Choice

Choice might be one of the most uncomplicated components to integrate daily, whether you are remote or hybrid. Strategies such as choice boards and playlists developed using Google tools afford students with greater control over their learning while also freeing up the teacher for targeted instruction or support.  I have really been impressed with the choice boards at the high school and how Canvas is being used to set them up. The elementary school has also upped their game as of late.

Path

They are many ways to allow students to determine their own path during remote or hybrid learning. Path could come in the form of customized curriculum, asynchronous virtual courses, selecting the order in a playlist, or independent study. It allows students to progress towards standards based on their mastery levels, interests, and goals. Utilizing adaptive learning tools as part of a station rotation model or playlist provides tasks that align with individual strengths and weaknesses. I love how middle school teachers responsible for remote learners have created a virtual station rotation model in Canvas.

Pace

Pace is as simple as allowing kids to work through activities where they have to self-manage their time in order to achieve mastery.  Some kids need more time while others less. Rigorous and relevant asynchronous tasks provide extended periods of time to complete tasks to reduce stress, dive deep into concepts, and prioritize learning. Self-paced activities allow all students to progress through concepts while freeing up the teacher to work with those who need the most help. The math department at Corinth High school has been using the flipped approach with Bitmoji classrooms as well as self-paced programs with a great deal of success. Students in the elementary school get to work at their own pace in various centers.

Place

Like many school districts, learners in Corinth can choose to work remotely at home or come to school for in-person learning, reducing anxiety and stress while emphasizing health and safety. For the students participating in in-class learning, social distancing measures need to be implemented. As a result, Zoom breakout rooms have been utilized extensively regardless of where kids are learning to foster discourse and collaboration.  I must say how impressed I have been to see how the elementary teachers are making this work across the entire school.

I am only scratching the surface regarding how Corinth School District educators have successfully utilized an array of high-agency approaches to personalize already this year. They have addressed the seven elements presented at the beginning of the post.  Over the summer, they planned and trained staff on how to use Canvas better. After some feedback from my initial coaching visits in August, the use of breakout rooms became the norm as a means to get kids talking. Building principals and teachers working together to process and reflect on each coaching visit combined with an intrinsic motivation to improve and epitomize outcome-based professional learning goals.  All in all, I couldn't be more proud of this district and what they have and will continue to accomplish.  

For more remote and hybrid learning strategies and resources, click HERE.

If you are interested in having a conversation about Aspire Change EDU's professional learning solutions, including job-embedded and ongoing coaching, let me know.

A Framework for Learning Through the Purposeful Use of Technology

Technology has the potential to transform teaching and learning in a number of ways. One way it can be used to transform teaching and learning is by providing students with access to a wealth of information, including multimedia resources, educational apps, and online databases. This means that students can engage with a wide range of material and have access to resources that they might not have been able to access otherwise. Additionally, this allows teachers to personalize the learning experience to meet all students' needs by providing them with access to different resources that can help them learn at their own pace and in their own way.

Another way technology can be used to transform teaching and learning is by enhancing engagement and motivation. It can be leveraged to create interactive and immersive learning experiences that can help students stay engaged and motivated in the classroom. For example, students can use virtual reality to explore different parts of the world or use interactive simulations to learn about scientific concepts. This kind of technology also allows for collaboration, where students can work together on projects and assignments and share their work with one another in real-time, which helps foster a sense of community and teamwork in the classroom.

Finally, technology can be harnessed to transform teaching and learning by enhancing assessment and feedback. Technology can be used to create assessments, quizzes, and evaluations, providing teachers with real-time data on student progress, enabling them to give feedback and adjust instruction accordingly. This helps ensure that students are getting the support they need to succeed and allows teachers to identify areas where students are struggling and provide additional support. Furthermore, technology can be used to track student progress over time, which can help teachers identify trends and patterns in student performance and adjust instruction accordingly.

The framework above, which I am tentatively calling Purposeful Use of Technology for Learning (PUTL), serves to develop a foundation and inform how technology can be used to support learner-driven experiences and outcomes. It includes the following components that are interconnected:

1. Sound pedagogy: A foundation should be established through the consistent use of effective Tier 1 instructional strategies that are research-based such as anticipatory set, reviewing prior learning, checking for understanding, modeling, scaffolded questions, guided practice, independent practice, and closure. From here, a variety of practical techniques can be employed, such as cooperative learning, differentiation, performance tasks, problem or project-based learning, etc.
2. Rigor & Relevance: Technology can be used to create interactive and immersive learning experiences that can help students stay engaged and motivated in the classroom. Activities should challenge students to think, construct new knowledge, and apply what has been learned to solve real-world predictable and unpredictable problems. Refer to the Relevant Thinking Framework to assist in integrating technology with purpose (image below).
3. Student agency: Technology can be used to create a personalized learning experience where all students get what they need, when and where they need it to succeed. Digital tools naturally support and enhance high-agency elements such as voice, choice, path, pace, and place. When looking to personalize through blended pedagogies, consider station rotation, choice activities, playlists, flipped lessons, and asynchronous virtual options (image below)
4. Critical competencies: Technology is becoming an increasingly important part of everyday life, and by incorporating it into the classroom, students can develop the competencies they will need to succeed in a disruptive world that is digitally connected and reliant.
5. Streamlined assessment and feedback: Technology can be used to create transparent and challenging assessments while providing teachers with real-time data on student progress, enabling them to give feedback and adjust instruction accordingly.
6. Actionable data: Technology has made it much easier to routinely collect data that can be used to monitor progress, offer quality feedback, analyze in professional learning communities (PLCs), and then provide needed student support through personalization. The immediacy with which metrics can be accessed provides all educators with invaluable knowledge at their fingertips when combined with ongoing and job-embedded professional learning.

Technology should be leveraged in a seamless fashion that supports and enhances learning for all kids, something I highlight extensively in Disruptive Thinking in Our Classrooms. The key takeaway from the framework presented is to help inform purposeful use in the classroom while unearthing opportunities to grow professionally. A great deal of money has been spent globally on technology. It is now our duty to make sure that investment pays off.

Value-Added Schools

No, this is not a post about value-added evaluation practices.  I believe that ship has sailed. There is a great deal of research and evidence out there that pretty much debunks the claims of many in the world of education reform that accountability systems based solely on student achievement data have any merit. What I would like to discuss are ways that schools can provide increased value to students based on changes to the learning culture.  A school can and should provide a meaningful learning experience for students.  If they do not see any value during the time spent in buildings then the chances are that opportunities to learn, and ultimately achieve, will be squandered.

Image credit: www.theinfohound.com/

Value-added schooling became important to me during my early years as a high school principal.  In 2009 as I took a device from a student for failing to follow school policy that student responded to me that school was like a jail.  This encounter translated into an “aha” moment.  It made me critically reflect not just on our policy towards student devices, but also on a wide range of elements that impacted the learning culture at my school. What I learned was that our policies, procedures, and programs weren’t necessarily geared towards the genuine interests and needs of our student body.  This is when we began our journey to create a school that worked better for kids than the one that had generally functioned better for the adults.

"Value-added schools capitalize on methodologies, ideas, and tools to better understand students while improving the learning experience."

Value-added schools place less of an emphasis on control, compliance, conformity, and certain rules that we as adults have a hard time rationalizing to students because they are so ridiculous.  Since students are unique individuals with a variety of needs and interests, the focus must be on creating policies and structures that are more kid-centric. Kids should want to come to school and learn. It is incumbent upon us to take a critical lens to our work and culture and make both small and big changes to add more value to a child’s experience in school. Building a greater sense of trust and leveraging this to develop powerful relationships are a consistent goal that we can all agree on.  Value-added schools:

• Focus more on learning as opposed to grades.
• Integrate more opportunities for play in K-12.
• Implement personalized (time, path, place, strengths/needs) and personal (interests, passions, relevancy) learning strategies.
• Actively address the “cemetery effect” by utilizing research-based and design thinking strategies to transform classroom learning environments.
• Emphasize student agency (voice, choice, advocacy) as a right for all
• Re-think homework and outdated grading practices to create a culture focused on R.E.A.L learning.
• Capitalize on the power of relationships by adding makerspaces, charging stations, thinking games (i.e. chess), and healthy food/drink options to common spaces to promote conversation between everyone.
• Treat connectivity as a life-line to this generation of kids and provide equitable access either in the form of devices or Internet. access. Connectivity is a way of life for our students. Take it from them and they will check out.
• Add an array of after-school programs that connect to interests and careers of the future.
• View technology as a ubiquitous component of the student learning experience rather than an add-on.

Sometimes our own beliefs and experiences get in the way of what’s possible. Thanks to the student who set me straight, many of the strategies above were embraced, implemented, and sustained during my time as a principal.  We not only added value, but were able to show efficacy in our work going forward. Don’t let your mindset or that of others hold you back. Thinking differently is a start, but we also need to act differently if we want to transform learning. Focus on the “what ifs” instead of the “yeah buts”. Don't prepare students for something. Prepare them for anything. Say yes more than you say no. Most importantly, be more empathetic by placing yourself in the shoes of your students.

So how have you helped to create a value-added school? I would love to hear and share your ideas. 

Unlock the Learning Gap: The Power of WIN Time

Recently, on my podcast Unpacking the Backpack, I dove into the concept of "WIN Time," or "What I Need Time." This idea is a powerful pedagogical shift designed to empower students and personalize learning. It's an essential component of reimagining how schools function. So, what exactly is WIN Time? At its core, it's a dedicated, flexible block of time built into the school day where students receive targeted support or enrichment based on their individual academic needs. It moves away from a one-size-fits-all approach and instead asks the critical question: "What does this specific student need right now to succeed?". This is something we discuss in detail in Personalize. 

Imagine a traditional classroom setting. Some students grasp concepts quickly, while others struggle with foundational skills. In a typical lesson, both groups move forward at the same pace, often leaving one group bored and disengaged, and the other increasingly frustrated and left behind. WIN Time is designed precisely to bridge this gap. It's a structured mechanism for immediate intervention for those who need extra help, a challenging extension for those who are ready for more, and fundamentally, a space for students to take ownership of their learning journey.

It's important to stress that WIN Time isn't simply about remediation; it’s about personalization on a grand scale. It acknowledges that learning is not linear and that every student's path is unique. This means identifying specific academic gaps through timely data, offering opportunities for advanced study, or even providing time for students to pursue passion projects related to their curriculum.

The Educational Imperative: Why We Need WIN Time

Why is a structured intervention time so crucial in today's educational landscape? The fundamental argument is that we need to move beyond simply covering content and instead focus on ensuring mastery. Traditional models often push students forward regardless of their depth of understanding, leading to cumulative, unaddressed gaps that become increasingly difficult to close as students progress through grades. WIN Time directly addresses this by providing a mechanism for timely and specific intervention.

Consider the data on learning gaps. When students consistently struggle with a concept, and those struggles are not addressed immediately, the gap between what they know and what they need to know widens exponentially. This leads to decreased confidence, significant disengagement, and ultimately, a disservice to the learner. WIN Time allows educators to be proactive, identifying struggles early and providing immediate, targeted support. This practice is about developing a growth mindset and building resilient, self-aware learners, not just improving a standardized test score.

Furthermore, implementing this dedicated time promotes student agency. Instead of being passive recipients of information, students become active participants in identifying their needs and pursuing their learning goals. They learn to self-assess, advocate for themselves, understand precisely where they need help, and seek out appropriate resources. This skill—self-advocacy—is a critical life skill that extends far beyond the classroom walls.

Overcoming Implementation Challenges

Adopting a flexible block like WIN Time is not without its challenges. One of the primary hurdles schools face is scheduling. How do you carve out a 30-to-45-minute dedicated block in an already packed school day? This often requires a willingness to critically rethink traditional schedules, perhaps by adjusting bell times, reallocating existing advisory periods, or modifying the length of core subject blocks. It demands a high degree of collaboration among all staff members and a shared commitment to the philosophy behind personalized support.

Another significant challenge is data collection and diagnosis. Identifying student needs effectively requires robust, ongoing formative assessment practices. Teachers need reliable, up-to-the-minute data to accurately determine who needs intervention, who needs enrichment, and the specific areas that require attention. This means embracing a continuous cycle of assessment, rapid analysis, and responsive, targeted instruction. We must move beyond reliance on delayed, summative tests.

Finally, there's the question of staffing and resources. Who facilitates this time? What specific materials are needed? While teachers are ideally equipped to provide differentiated instruction within their own classrooms, there are opportunities to leverage support from specialists, counselors, or even trained peer mentors to contribute. The key is to organize and utilize all available resources efficiently to create a rich and supportive learning environment that maximizes the time.

Practical Applications: What WIN Time Looks Like

Now, let's look at the practical application. What does a successful WIN Time model actually look like in a school setting? Data is used to enhance the teaching and learning process through a variety of pathways:

• Teacher teams sharing learners: Students might be assigned to different "WIN groups" based on current academic performance and diagnostic data; these assignments must be fluid and change week to week.

• Station rotation: Read more HERE.
• Modified rotations: Read more HERE.
• Must-do / may-do: Read more HERE.
• Playlists: Read more HERE.
• Choice boards: Read more HERE.

Below you can see how the above strategies connect to RTI (Tier 2 and 3 suppport).

The true strength of this approach is its flexibility. It is not a rigid program but a dynamic framework that can and should be adapted to the unique context of each school, its population, and its curriculum structure.

The Transformative Potential

When implemented effectively, the results of this focused, personalized learning time can be truly transformative for student outcomes.

• Improved Academic Performance: By providing highly targeted support exactly when it's needed, students close academic gaps more quickly, leading to improved understanding and higher achievement across all subjects.
• Increased Student Engagement: When learning is personalized, relevant, and directly addresses a student's current challenge or interest, they are far more likely to be engaged and motivated. They feel seen, heard, and actively supported.
• Enhanced Self-Efficacy: As students repeatedly experience success through focused effort and take ownership of their learning path, their confidence and belief in their own ability to learn grow significantly.
• Development of Competencies: This protected time naturally develops and refines critical competencies like critical thinking, self-regulation, problem-solving, focused collaboration, and, most importantly, self-advocacy.

WIN Time is about more than making incremental improvements; it's about fundamentally rethinking what school can be. It challenges the traditional rigid model of education and moves us towards a more student-centered, agile, and responsive approach. It is a powerful structural commitment to equity, ensuring that every student, regardless of their starting point, has the dedicated time and support necessary to thrive. It’s not just "What I Need Time," it’s a commitment to a mastery-based educational model.