The Profound Impact of Leader Modeling

The concept of "do as I say, not as I do" has no place in school leadership. As educational leaders, we are the architects of our school’s culture, and every action we take serves as a blueprint for our staff and students. Modeling is not just a soft skill; it is a rigorous, intentional practice that bridges the gap between abstract vision and daily reality. When we lead by example, we provide a living demonstration of the values we expect others to uphold.

The Power of Observational Learning

At its core, modeling is rooted in the idea that people learn more from what they observe than from what they are told. In a school setting, teachers are constantly looking to their principals and administrators to gauge what is truly valued. If we advocate for lifelong learning but never share our own professional growth, the message falls flat.

Research consistently shows that leadership behavior directly influences teacher efficacy and commitment. When leaders model pedagogical involvement, it signals that the core business of the school is teaching and learning. According to May and Supovitz (2011), the frequency and quality of a principal's instructional leadership activities are significantly associated with changes in teacher practice. By being present in classrooms and participating in professional learning communities, we move from being mere managers to being active lead learners.

Building Relational Trust through Consistency

Modeling is also the primary vehicle for building trust. Trust is the "lubricant" that allows the gears of a school to turn smoothly. If a leader expects staff to be vulnerable and take risks with new pedagogical strategies, that leader must first demonstrate vulnerability. This might mean admitting when a new initiative did not go as planned or asking for feedback on a presentation at a faculty meeting.

Trust is not built through grand gestures but through the consistent alignment of words and actions. When leaders model consistency and fairness, it creates a psychological safety net for staff. This environment is essential for innovation. Without the trust established through leader modeling, teachers may hesitate to deviate from safe, traditional methods for fear of reprisal or a lack of support. As I stated in Digital Leadership, without trust, there is no relationship. Without relationships, no real change will ever occur. 

Professionalism and Emotional Intelligence

The "hidden curriculum" of leadership includes how we handle stress, conflict, and setbacks. Our emotional intelligence serves as a thermostat for the building. If we remain calm and solution-oriented during a crisis, the staff is likely to follow suit. Conversely, a leader who reacts with frustration or opacity can inadvertently create a culture of anxiety.

Modeling professional behavior also extends to how we interact with all stakeholders. Respectful communication, even in the face of disagreement, sets a standard for how teachers should interact with parents and how students should interact with one another. We cannot demand a culture of respect if we do not embody it in every email, meeting, and hallway conversation.

Impact on Student Outcomes

While it might seem that a leader’s modeling only affects the adults in the building, the ripple effect eventually reaches the students. A leadership style focused on modeling high expectations and continuous improvement creates a trickle-down effect. When teachers feel supported and see high standards modeled by their leaders, they are more likely to mirror those behaviors in their own classrooms.

The relationship between leadership and student achievement is well-documented. Sebastian and Allensworth (2012) found that the influence of leadership on classroom instruction and student performance is mediated by the professional environment of the school. Essentially, the leader sets the conditions. By modeling a relentless focus on student needs and data-informed decision-making, we empower our teachers to do the same, leading to improved academic results.

The Responsibility of the Mirror

Leadership by modeling is a 24/7 commitment. It requires a high level of self-awareness and the humility to recognize that we are always being watched. Every choice we make, from the way we handle a difficult parent phone call to the way we prioritize our schedule, tells a story about what we believe. Leading through both mirrors and windows is vital. 

If we want schools that are innovative, compassionate, and academically rigorous, we must be the first practitioners of those traits. We are the mirror in which our school culture sees itself. By modeling the excellence we seek, we don't just lead a school; we transform it.

May, H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2011). The variable effects of instructional leadership: How principal leadership varies across schools and teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332-370.

Printy, S. M., Marks, H. M., & Bowers, A. J. (2009). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership, 19(5), 504-532.

Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626-663.

Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014). What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 96-134.

Why the Future of Assessment is Competency-Based

The following is a condensed version of my article titled "From Compliance to Competency."

For over a decade, the industrial-age model of schooling has prioritized compliance over competency and "seat time" over mastery. As I argue, maintaining these outdated systems is tantamount to instructional malpractice. We owe students a model that reflects how learning actually happens: nonlinearly, personally, and at varying paces.

The shift toward Standards-Based Assessment (SBA) and Competency-Based Education (CBE) isn't a trend; it's a necessary reckoning. To move from philosophy to district-wide practice, educators need a robust digital infrastructure. This is where Edsby Destinations comes in.

The Case for Change: Beyond the "B-Minus"

Traditional grading is fundamentally broken. A single letter grade often blends academic achievement with behavioral compliance, homework completion, and participation. This "number" obscures more than it reveals.

• SBA asks: Has the student demonstrated proficiency against specific standards?
• CBE ensures: Students advance upon mastery, not based on the calendar.

In a competency-based model, an early failure doesn't define a student’s final grade. Instead, the most recent, consistent demonstration of understanding counts. This culture builds resilient learners who chase mastery rather than points.

Empowering Student Agency

When students see exactly where they stand against defined outcomes, they can set goals and self-assess. Research shows that self-regulation increases significantly when students engage with clear success criteria. Outcomes-based reporting gives students a clear destination and the freedom to chart their own course toward it via portfolios, projects, and authentic artifacts, something my co-author and I emphasize in Personalize.

The Scaling Challenge: Why Infrastructure Matters

Many districts understand the "why" of CBE but struggle with the "how." Transitioning a large system to outcomes-based assessment generates a massive volume of data, including visual artifacts, self-assessments, and longitudinal observations, that traditional Gradebooks simply cannot handle.

Edsby Destinations was purpose-built to solve this complexity at scale. Unlike generic LMS tools that are retrofitted for standards, Edsby is engineered for the specific workflows of K-12 organizations.

Key Features of Edsby Destinations

• Visual Evidence of Learning: Capture photos, videos, and work products tagged directly to learning outcomes.
• Student-Centric Dashboards: Students receive a graphical overview of their journey, showing where they are and where they need to go in real-time.
• Co-Created Success Criteria: Teachers and students can collaborate on what "success" looks like, promoting ownership.
• Accessibility for All: Mobile apps with QR code logins remove barriers for younger learners, making "visible learning" possible in early elementary grades.
• District-Level Transparency: Dashboards provide administrators with a bird’s-eye view of progress across the entire system while allowing for "drill-down" views into individual student growth.

Engaging the Whole Community

Assessment is the primary touchpoint between schools and families. Edsby Destinations shifts the dinner-table conversation from "What grade did you get?" to "What did you learn?" By providing parents with real-time visibility into authentic work products rather than a static PDF report card, schools can build a true home-school partnership.

Leading the Transformation

Technology should serve pedagogy, not the other way around. The shift to standards-based assessment is a leadership challenge that requires a strategic mindset and the right tools. With Edsby Destinations, the vision of a competency-based future becomes an operational reality, honoring each student's individual path to mastery.

Be sure to read my full-length article titled "From Compliance to Competency."

The Unwavering Power of Self-Efficacy in Education

In our pursuit of improving student learning, we often focus on curriculum, technology, and pedagogy. While these are all critical components, we sometimes overlook one of the most powerful drivers of success in our schools: self-efficacy. It is that unwavering belief in our own ability to make a difference, to overcome challenges, and to ultimately impact student achievement. This is not just a feel-good concept; it is a research-backed imperative for every teacher and leader who is serious about creating a thriving learning culture. You can listen to more about this on my podcast Unpacking the Backpack. 

Self-efficacy, as defined by Albert Bandura, is the belief in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments. For educators, this translates to a deep-seated confidence in their ability to positively influence student outcomes. Research has consistently shown a strong correlation between teacher self-efficacy and student achievement. Teachers with a high sense of efficacy are more likely to try new instructional strategies, persist in the face of setbacks, and create a positive and engaging classroom environment (Jerrim & Tars, 2025).

But where does this powerful belief come from? It is not something we are born with; it is cultivated through experience, observation, and feedback. This is where the role of leadership becomes paramount. School leaders who actively develop a culture of trust, collaboration, and support can significantly impact teacher self-efficacy. When teachers feel that their leaders believe in them, they are more likely to believe in themselves. This is not just about providing resources; it is about creating a school climate where teachers feel empowered to take risks, to innovate, and to grow professionally (Liu & Hallinger, 2018).

Transformational leadership, in particular, has been shown to have a profound impact on teacher self-efficacy and, in turn, on their innovative behavior in the classroom (Zainal & Matore, 2021). When leaders inspire a shared vision, provide individualized support, and intellectually stimulate their staff, they create the conditions for self-efficacy to flourish. This is not about top-down mandates; it is about a collaborative partnership where leaders and teachers work together to achieve common goals. The research is clear: leadership behaviors have a statistically significant relationship with teachers' efficacy (Winn et al., 2021).

The concept of self-efficacy extends beyond the classroom to the leaders themselves. Leaders with a strong sense of self-efficacy are more likely to be effective in their roles, to inspire confidence in their staff, and to create a positive school culture (Paglis, 2010). They are the pedagogical leaders who are not afraid to roll up their sleeves, to be visible in classrooms, and to model the very behaviors they expect from their teachers. They understand that their own belief in their ability to lead is contagious and sets the tone for the entire school community.

So, how can we cultivate this essential quality in ourselves and in others? It starts with a commitment to continuous learning and professional growth. It involves seeking out opportunities to collaborate with colleagues, to observe best practices, and to receive constructive feedback. It means celebrating successes, learning from failures, and always maintaining a growth mindset. As leaders, it means creating a culture where it is safe to be vulnerable, to ask for help, and to take on new challenges. Below are some reflective questions to consider:

1. How does my personal belief in my ability to influence student outcomes change the way I respond to instructional challenges or setbacks? 
2. What specific actions am I taking to foster a culture of trust and collaboration that empowers my colleagues to take risks in their teaching? 
3. In what ways am I modeling a commitment to continuous professional growth and vulnerability to show others that learning is a lifelong process? 
4. How do our current professional learning and feedback structures prioritize the celebration of success and the mastery of new skills to increase our shared sense of capability? 

In the end, self-efficacy is the bedrock of effective teaching and leadership. It is the quiet confidence that allows us to navigate the complexities of our profession with grace and determination. It is the unwavering belief that we can, and will, make a difference in the lives of our students. Let us all commit to nurturing this powerful force within ourselves and within our schools. Our students deserve nothing less.

Jerrim, J., & Tars, E. (2025). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional practice, and student outcomes: Evidence from the TALIS Video Study. American Educational Research Journal, 62(2). 

Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018 ). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501–528. 

Paglis, L. L. (2010 ). Leadership self-efficacy: Research findings and practical applications. Journal of Management Development, 29(9), 771–782. 

Winn, C. S., Cothern, T. L., Lastrapes, R., & Orange, A. (2021 ). Teacher self-efficacy and principal leadership behaviors. ICPEL Education Leadership Review, 22(1), 17–26.

Zainal, M. A., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2021). The influence of teachers' self-efficacy and school leaders' transformational leadership practices on teachers' innovative behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6423. 

The Role of Human Interaction in Deep Learning

Do you like “shiny” things as much as I do? If so, don’t fret, as it is human nature.  We often find ourselves captivated by the latest digital tools, such as AI-driven platforms and virtual environments. While these innovations offer incredible potential to scale resources, they frequently miss the most critical component of the educational experience: the human element. Real learning, specifically the kind that supports disruptive thinking and deep cognitive engagement, does not happen in a vacuum of screens and algorithms. It happens through connection.

To truly transform student outcomes, we must shift our focus back to the power of human interaction. Deep learning is not a passive act of consumption; it is an active, social process. When we prioritize human-centered learning experiences, particularly through high-dosage, in-person tutoring, we move beyond simple content delivery and toward a model that prioritizes the whole child.

The Science of Connection and Cognitive Engagement

The importance of human interaction is grounded in more than just sentiment; it is backed by decades of rigorous research. Learning is fundamentally a social endeavor. When students interact with a mentor or tutor in person, they are not just receiving information. They are participating in a feedback loop that stimulates higher-order thinking.

Research has consistently shown that human interaction is the primary driver of academic growth. For instance, Nickow, Hull, and Ritter (2020) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental evidence, concluding that tutoring programs consistently yield large positive effects on student learning outcomes across various subjects and grade levels. Their findings emphasize that the structured, personal nature of tutoring is significantly more effective than many other classroom-based interventions.

This effectiveness is rooted in the way humans engage cognitively. According to the ICAP framework, interactive learning, which occurs when students engage in dialogue and collaborative problem-solving with another person, leads to the highest levels of knowledge acquisition. Chi and Wylie (2014) argue that interactive activities are superior to constructive, active, or passive ones because they require students to co-construct knowledge through social mediation. In a virtual-only model, this social mediation is often diluted, resulting in lower cognitive depth.

In-Person vs. Virtual: The Need for Human-Centered Models

While virtual models provided a necessary bridge during the pandemic, the data now clearly shows a preference for the depth that in-person interaction provides. The difference lies in the nuance of communication: the ability of a tutor to read body language, sense frustration before it becomes a barrier, and pivot strategies in real-time. This level of responsiveness is difficult to replicate in a purely digital space.

Disruptive thinking requires a safe environment where students feel seen and supported, something I strongly emphasize in my book Personalize. High-impact, human-centered tutoring creates a space where "failure" is reframed as a necessary step toward mastery. This is particularly vital for students who have fallen behind. Guryan et al. (2023) demonstrated that intensive, in-person tutoring for adolescents can lead to substantial gains in academic performance. This proves that even for older students, the "human touch" can close gaps that traditional instruction struggles to reach.

When we integrate people, curriculum, and technology correctly, the results are transformative. The goal is not to abandon technology but to use it as a scaffold for human interaction. For example, using a proprietary, standards-aligned digital curriculum enables precise data tracking, but the true magic happens when a trained tutor sits beside a student to navigate it together. This hybrid approach, which puts pedagogy and people first and technology second, is what drives sustainable growth.

Evidence-Based Success: A Closer Look

The efficacy of this approach is reflected in recent performance data. During the 2024–2025 school year, students utilizing integrated in-person tutoring models from HeyTutor saw a 160% increase in those testing at or above grade level in Math and a 162% increase in ELA from the beginning to the end of their programs. The impact on English Learners was equally profound, with a 95% increase in Math and a 92% increase in ELA proficiency. 

These results align with the broader consensus on evidence-based reform. Slavin (2018) notes that for educational interventions to be truly effective and scalable, they must be grounded in proven methods that emphasize personalized, small-group instruction. This focus on evidence is why programs that prioritize in-person, small-group interventions such as HeyTutor have been recognized with honors like Stanford University’s National Student Support Accelerator Badge and the 2025 Tech and Learning Awards in Primary and Secondary Education.

A compelling example of this in action can be seen in the SUHSD Case Study, which highlights how the value of in-person learning provides insights that go far beyond what a dashboard can report. It is about the shift in student confidence and the ability to think critically and disruptively about the world around them.

Moving Forward: Prioritizing the Human Element

As we look toward the future of education, we must ensure that our "innovations" do not inadvertently isolate our students. The best solution for deeper student engagement and academic growth remains the intentional connection between a dedicated human being and a learner. By emphasizing in-person, small-group tutoring, we provide students with the social-emotional support and cognitive challenge they need to thrive.

We have the tools, the research, and the data. Now, we must have the leadership to prioritize the human connection in every classroom and every learning session. To see how these principles are being put into practice to drive record-breaking student growth, I encourage you to check out HeyTutor and join the movement toward human-centered educational excellence.

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243.

Guryan, J., Ludwig, J., Bhatt, M. P., Cook, P. J., Davis, J. M. V., Dodge, K., Farkas, G., Fryer, R. G., Jr., Mayer, S. E., Pollack, H. A., & Steinberg, L. (2023). Not too late: Improving academic outcomes among adolescents. American Economic Review, 113(3), 738-765.

Nickow, A., Hull, A. F., & Ritter, G. W. (2020). The effects of tutoring on education outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(3), 397-451.

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Evidence-based reform in education. European Journal of Education, 53(3), 301-312.