Shifting the Narrative From "We Can't" to "How Can We?"

Change is hard. Actually, it is really hard. Not only have I written extensively about this fact for years, but I also suspect that everyone reading this post has had a similar experience.  One main reason for this is a tendency to focus on things we cannot control, which redirects energy to the wrong things. The end result is a thought process about why we can’t change or improve our practice, something I discussed in detail recently on my podcast, Unpacking the Backpack. Change can and will happen if we focus on the right question. 

A pervasive mindset of "we can't" often hinders progress. It's a phrase that stifles innovation and dismisses new ideas before they even have a chance to take root. To genuinely prepare students for a disruptive world, both school leaders and teachers must make a fundamental shift: from dwelling on limitations to proactively asking, "How can we?" This isn't just about forced optimism; it's a strategic framework for finding solutions, leveraging collective strength, and fostering a culture of continuous learning.

The Leader's Role: Cultivating a Solutions-Oriented Culture

A leader's response to a challenge sets the tone for the entire school. Instead of listing reasons why a new initiative is impossible—"We can't do that because we don't have the time or resources"—an effective leader asks, "How can we achieve this goal given our current constraints?" This subtle change in language shifts the focus from limitations to possibilities. By modeling this approach, leaders empower teachers and show that their professional expertise is valued. This leadership style builds a sense of shared ownership and trust. As noted by Leithwood et al. (2004), leaders who promote a clear vision and provide genuine support for their staff are critical to creating a positive school culture and significantly improving school effectiveness. They transform the conversation from a list of barriers into a collaborative problem-solving session where everyone is an active participant in finding a way forward.

The Teacher's Role: From Data Judgment to Growth Roadmap

For teachers, embracing the "how can we?" mindset often means reframing the purpose of student data. Instead of viewing it as a judgment on their teaching—"I can't get everyone to mastery"—they see it as a roadmap for growth. For example, when faced with widespread learning gaps, a teacher can shift the question to, "How can we use diagnostic data to adjust our initial instruction and prevent these gaps from widening?" This approach encourages teachers to dive deep into student work and assessment results, pinpointing specific areas of need and then collaboratively designing targeted interventions. Marzano, Pickering, and Pollock (2001) demonstrated that data-informed instructional strategies, applied with fidelity, have a profound impact on student achievement. This isn't about working harder; it's about working smarter, using evidence to guide decisions and refine practices.

The Collective Effort: Collaboration as a Catalyst for Change

The "how can we?" philosophy thrives in a strong Professional Learning Community (PLC). Instead of a teacher lamenting, "I can't seem to reach this student," a PLC asks, "How can we, as a team, pool our expertise and resources to ensure this student succeeds?" This collective approach acknowledges that a single teacher shouldn't have to solve every challenge alone. When teachers regularly collaborate to analyze student work and share successful strategies, the group's collective intelligence becomes a powerful engine for improvement. Effective PLCs focused on learning, rather than simply on teaching, develop a shared responsibility for student outcomes. This collaborative environment transforms individual struggles into shared challenges, encouraging a spirit of teamwork and innovation that can tackle even the most persistent problems.

The Path Forward: A Commitment to Iteration and Resilience

Cultivating a "how can we?" culture requires a commitment to continuous learning and iterative improvement, something I discuss in detail in Digital Leadership. It accepts that not every solution will be perfect on the first try. When an initiative faces initial difficulties, the mindset shifts from "It didn't work" to "How can we refine this approach based on what we've learned?"

This resilience, combined with a willingness to experiment and reflect, is foundational to genuine progress. Black and Wiliam (1998) famously demonstrated the power of formative assessment and feedback in improving student learning, highlighting that continuous adjustment based on evidence is key. By embracing this ethos of inquiry, leaders and teachers can unlock an unprecedented potential for growth, transforming their school community into a place where student success isn't just a hope, but a systematic outcome.

Shifting from "we can't" to "how can we?" isn't a silver bullet, but it is the essential mindset for navigating the complexities of education today. It's about empowering every member of the school community to be an active agent of change, fostering innovation, and ultimately, building a school where student success is not just hoped for, but systematically engineered.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership Project. The Wallace Foundation. 

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 

Strong, M. (2009). Effective teacher induction and mentoring programs: A review of research literature and implications for policy. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 173-201.

Moving Beyond the Leadership Checklist

Leading for impact isn't about implementing a shiny new initiative or checking off boxes on an observation form. It’s about developing a culture of meaningful change where the learning is deep and the outcomes are tangible. As leaders, our role isn't just to manage; it's to model, inspire, and empower others to do their best work. This is how we move from simply being present to truly making a difference.  Recently, on Unpacking the Backpack, I shared some thoughts on the topic. Listen on Spotify or wherever you access your favorite podcasts. Below are some expanded reflections, along with relevant research.

Many leaders fall into the trap of focusing on compliance and control, but this approach stifles innovation and disempowers staff. True impact comes from a commitment to people, pedagogy, intentionality, and accountability. We need to shift our mindset from "What do I need to do?" to "How can I help others succeed?" This means building strong relationships, building trust, and creating an environment where risks are welcomed and mistakes are seen as learning opportunities.

Checklists can be a great tool for getting things done, but driving meaningful, positive change rather than just managing tasks should be the ultimate goal. It starts with a clear vision and purpose, defining what success truly looks like and communicating that "why" to everyone involved. Impactful leaders are also deeply self-aware and emotionally intelligent, understanding their strengths, managing their emotions, and connecting empathetically with their teams. They build a culture of trust and psychological safety, fostering open communication and empowering others through effective delegation, coaching, and genuine recognition.

Ultimately, leading for impact requires continuous learning and adaptability in a changing world, seeing setbacks as opportunities for growth. It's about focusing relentlessly on results and accountability, using data to inform decisions and holding both yourself and others responsible for achieving shared goals. By consistently leading with integrity, resilience, and passion, you inspire action and create a ripple effect of positive change that extends far beyond your immediate team.

In my experience, effective leaders for impact are lead learners. They are unafraid to explore new ideas, experiment with technology, and share their own learning journey. This vulnerability builds credibility and shows our staff that we are all in this together. Research by Fullan (2014) highlights that moral purpose—the commitment to making a difference in the lives of students—is a key driver of effective leadership. It's the "why" that fuels the "what." This aligns with the findings of Leithwood et al. (2004), who found that leadership has a significant, albeit indirect, effect on student learning.

Leading for impact also requires us to get out of our offices and into the classrooms. We must be visible, engaged, and present to truly understand the needs of our school community. This isn't about "gotcha" moments; it's about being a resource, a coach, and a supporter. It’s about asking probing questions and co-constructing solutions. When we do this, we empower our teachers and students to become agents of their own growth, a concept reinforced by Robinson et al. (2009), who emphasized the importance of instructional leadership that is focused on what happens in the classroom. This is the essence of my work on Digital Leadership (Sheninger, 2019) – using our platforms not just to manage but to inspire and connect.

Below is a list of thirteen (13) specific actions I took as a principal to be a more impactful leader:

• Five (5) learning walks a day by each building administrator for non-evaluative feedback
• Collecting assessments instead of lesson plans two weeks in the future
• Creating an equitable grading philosophy and holding staff accountable to it
• Three (3) unannounced formal observations for every teacher 
• Development of shared norms for every lesson (standards-aligned learning targets, relevance, high-effect strategies, rigorous questioning/tasks, closure)
• Creation of quarterly benchmarks aligned to standards and standardized tests
• Dedicated PLC time connected to benchmarks and common formative assessments (CFA’s)
• Monthly principal’s report sharing teacher successes and building capacity (read more HERE)
• Flipped our faculty meetings where agenda items were pushed out for feedback, comments, and additions using Google Classroom and discussed asynchronously. Staff meeting time was then focused on one (1) question: How do we improve learning for our students?
• Transparent action plans for our building that had quantifiable metrics to support building goals, where progress and expectations were reviewed each month.
• Creation of a steering committee to elicit feedback from staff and students on how we could improve school culture and achievement.
• I led professional learning after school to model. 
• Admin PLC to analyze walk-through data and present feedback at faculty meetings (this was done to model effective PLC's for our staff)

Leading for impact is a continuous journey. It’s about consistently reflecting on our practices and asking ourselves, “Is this truly serving our students?” As Hattie (2009) reminds us, the goal is to see learning through the eyes of the student. By focusing on people, embracing a growth mindset, and staying connected to our purpose, we can move beyond simply managing to truly leading for lasting impact.

Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: A moral imperative. Corwin Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation.

Robinson, V. M. J., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. New Zealand Ministry of Education.

Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times (2nd Edition). Corwin Press.

Your Mindset is Your Masterpiece

Your mindset isn't just a perspective; it's the invisible architect of your reality. It determines not what you see, but how you interpret and act upon it, ultimately shaping your experiences, your resilience, and your growth potential. Cultivate it wisely, for it holds the key to unlocking everything you aspire to be. Recently, on Unpacking the Backpack, I shared some thoughts on the topic after revisiting a blog post I wrote in 2018. Listen on Spotify or wherever you access your favorite podcasts. Below are some expanded thoughts on the topic, along with relevant research.

In my years working with educators and leaders, I’ve consistently observed a fundamental truth: our beliefs are powerful architects of our experiences. What we deeply hold to be true, whether consciously or unconsciously, significantly influences our actions, perceptions, and ultimately, the outcomes we achieve. This isn't some abstract philosophical concept; it's a tangible force that shapes everything from classroom culture to organizational success. Understanding and harnessing the power of belief is crucial for anyone striving to create positive change.

Think about the concept of self-efficacy, an individual's belief in their capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments (Bandura, 1977). Research has consistently shown a strong correlation between a teacher's self-efficacy and their effectiveness in the classroom, impacting student achievement and motivation (Ross, 1998). If an educator believes they can reach even the most challenging students, their approach, persistence, and ultimately, their results are likely to reflect that conviction. Conversely, a lack of belief can create a self-fulfilling prophecy, limiting potential before it's even explored.

This principle extends beyond individual capabilities to encompass our beliefs about others and our environments. Consider the Pygmalion effect, where higher expectations lead to an increase in performance (Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1968). While the original study has faced some methodological critiques, the underlying principle remains powerful: our beliefs about the potential of those around us can significantly influence their growth and development. As leaders, our beliefs about our teams, our students, and our communities set the stage for what is possible.

The impact of belief also manifests in how we interpret challenges and setbacks. A growth mindset, as popularized by Dweck (2006), posits that individuals who believe their abilities can be developed through dedication and hard work tend to persevere through difficulties, view failures as learning opportunities, and ultimately achieve greater success. This contrasts with a fixed mindset, where abilities are seen as innate and unchangeable, often leading to avoidance of challenges and a sense of helplessness in the face of obstacles. Cultivating a belief in our capacity for growth and adaptation is essential in today's rapidly evolving educational landscape.

Our collective beliefs shape organizational culture. If a school community believes in collaboration, innovation, and continuous improvement, those values will permeate the daily interactions, decision-making processes, and overall climate. Conversely, beliefs rooted in scarcity, blame, or resistance to change can stifle progress and create a toxic environment. Leaders play a critical role in shaping these collective beliefs through their communication, actions, and the stories they amplify (Schein, 2010). By intentionally fostering beliefs that align with our vision for the future, we can cultivate more resilient, effective, and thriving organizations.

Reflecting on your own practices, I encourage you to consider the underlying beliefs that drive your decisions and interactions. What do you truly believe is possible for your students, your colleagues, and yourself? Are there any limiting beliefs holding you back from reaching your full potential or fostering the growth of those around you? Take some time this week to critically examine your internal narratives and identify one belief you can actively work to shift towards a more empowering and growth-oriented perspective. The power to shape your reality truly begins within. This can result in a reformed mindset, which becomes your masterpiece.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House. 

Ross, J. A. (1998). Antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 7, pp. 49-73). JAI Press.

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. 

The Art of Adaptation: Navigating and Justifying Change

Justifying change isn't just about presenting an idea; it's about building the bridge from current challenges to future possibilities, making the journey clear and compelling for everyone involved. Recently, on Unpacking the Backpack, I shared some thoughts on the topic after revisiting a blog post I wrote in 2024. Listen on Spotify or wherever you access your favorite podcasts. Below are some expanded thoughts on the topic, along with relevant research.

Change is a constant in education, driven by evolving student needs, new pedagogical research, technological advancements, and shifting societal expectations. Justifying these changes effectively within a school or district requires a clear articulation of the "why," backed by evidence, and a commitment to inclusive communication. When stakeholders, from teachers and parents to students and community members, understand the rationale and benefits, resistance can transform into enthusiastic support.

The Imperative for Change 

In a disruptive world, change is a constant. New research emerges on how children learn best, technology offers innovative teaching tools, and societal demands require schools to prepare students for an ever-changing world. For instance, the shift towards personalized learning into the curriculum isn't arbitrary; it's a response to research indicating better student outcomes (Durlak et al., 2011). Ignoring these shifts can lead to stagnant educational practices that fail to serve students effectively, potentially leaving them unprepared for future challenges (Fullan, 2015).

Building a Data-Enhanced Justification

Effective justification for change in K-12 relies heavily on data and evidence. This isn't just about standardized test scores; it encompasses a broader range of qualitative and quantitative indicators. For example, suppose a school is considering a new literacy program, presenting data on current reading comprehension levels. In that case, student engagement in reading or teacher feedback on existing resources provides a strong case. A decline in student motivation or an increase in behavioral issues may justify a new approach to classroom management or professional learning that focuses on engagement.

Benchmarking against successful schools or districts can also provide powerful evidence. If a new teaching methodology has significantly improved student outcomes in similar settings, this data can be compelling. Educational leaders often employ action research or pilot programs to gather localized data, demonstrating the potential impact of a change before implementing it more widely (Mills, 2018).

So why am I suggesting a move away from a data-driven mindset? Data-enhanced change recognizes that while data provides crucial insights, human judgment, experience, and qualitative factors are equally vital for successful implementation, fostering a more nuanced and adaptable approach. Unlike purely data-driven change, which can sometimes overlook contextual complexities and human elements, data-enhanced change integrates quantitative evidence with stakeholder input and practical wisdom to guide decisions.

Communicating the Vision and Benefits

Once the need for change is established, it's crucial to articulate a clear vision of the improved future state and the tangible benefits it will bring to students, staff, and the wider school community. For instance, if a district is moving to a new grading system, the communication should explain how it will provide more accurate feedback to students and parents, reduce teacher workload, or better reflect student mastery. For teachers, the benefits might include more effective teaching tools, reduced stress, or enhanced professional learning opportunities. For parents, it could be clearer communication about student progress or improved safety protocols. 

As I shared in Digital Leadership, active and transparent communication, including town hall meetings, dedicated websites, and regular updates, is paramount. Addressing potential anxieties and providing professional learning opportunities for staff are essential to mitigating resistance and fostering a sense of shared purpose (DuFour & DuFour, 2012).

Overcoming Resistance and Building Embracement 

Resistance to change often stems from comfort with the familiar, concerns about increased workload, or skepticism about the benefits. Acknowledging these concerns openly and creating channels for genuine feedback are critical. Engaging stakeholders in the change process itself significantly increases embracement. This could involve forming committees with teacher and parent representation, piloting new programs in a few classrooms before scaling, or providing ample training and support. Empowering "change champions" – respected teachers or staff members who embrace the new initiative – can also be highly effective in influencing peers (Kotter, 2012). By developing a collaborative environment where voices are heard and concerns are addressed, leaders can transform potential obstacles into opportunities for collective growth and improved student learning.

Justifying change is crucial for growth, driven by evolving student needs, research, and technology. This requires a data-enhanced approach that combines evidence with human judgment, clearly articulating the vision and benefits to stakeholders. By prioritizing open communication and active engagement, educators can transform resistance into widespread support for necessary reforms.

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432.

DuFour, R., & DuFour, R. (2012). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.

Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.