Leading in the AI Era: More Than Just Tech, It’s a Mindset Shift

Let’s be honest: AI isn't some distant future we can leisurely plan for anymore. It’s here. It's in our students’ pockets, our teachers' lesson planning tools, and—if you’re savvy—it's streamlining your own administrative tasks. For those of us in educational leadership, this isn't just another shiny new tech tool; it's a fundamental shift, a powerful force that demands not just our attention, but a complete overhaul of our leadership paradigm.

The knee-jerk reaction might be fear: fear of cheating, fear of job displacement, fear of the unknown. But as leaders, our job isn't to recoil; it’s to reframe. AI isn't a threat to human ingenuity; it's a catalyst that compels us to redefine what truly makes us human and, by extension, what truly makes education valuable.

The Efficiency Dividend: Reclaiming Time for What Matters

First, let's talk practical. The administrative burden on school leaders is crushing. Budgets, schedules, compliance reports, endless emails—these tasks eat into the precious time we should be spending on pedagogical leadership, building relationships, and working to sustain a positive school culture. This is where AI offers an immediate, tangible benefit.

AI can automate many of these mundane, repetitive tasks. Think about using AI to draft initial policy documents, analyze attendance data for early intervention, or even optimize complex school schedules. Research supports this, showing that AI applications can significantly enhance operational efficiencies in educational institutions, freeing up human capital for more strategic endeavors (Tzafilkou et al., 2023). 

This isn't about replacing people; it's about liberating people from the tyranny of the trivial. When you use AI to draft that newsletter or synthesize that report, you reclaim hours. Hours you can then reinvest in coaching teachers, mentoring students, or engaging with your community. That’s leadership amplified.

Redefining Learning: Beyond Recall

The conversation around AI in schools often defaults to "how do we stop students from cheating?" While academic integrity is critical, that's a microscopic view of a massive challenge. The real question is: How do we redesign learning when factual recall is largely outsourced to an algorithm? As I shared in Disruptive Thinking in Our Classrooms, the key to the future is helping students replace conventional ideas with innovative solutions to authentic problems. 

This is where leadership truly shines. We must guide our educators to pivot towards pedagogy that emphasizes uniquely human skills: critical thinking, complex problem-solving, creativity, collaboration, and ethical reasoning. If an AI can answer it, the question wasn't deep enough. We need to create environments where students use AI as a tool for inquiry, brainstorming, and editing, not as a shortcut to bypass learning. Studies highlight the transformative potential of AI in providing personalized learning experiences, but also underscore the necessity for educators to adapt their instructional strategies to leverage these tools effectively (Hwang et al., 2020). This requires a significant investment in professional learning, not just in how to use AI, but in how to teach differently in an AI-powered world. It is also something that my co-author and I address in our book Personalize: Meeting the Needs of All Learners and the services provided by my consultancy Aspire Change EDU. 

The Ethical Imperative: Leading with Integrity and Equity

Perhaps the most critical role for leaders in the AI age is that of the ethical steward. AI systems are only as unbiased as the data they're trained on. If that data reflects societal inequities, the AI will perpetuate and even amplify those biases. This means leaders must become fluent in asking tough questions about the AI tools they adopt. Specifically, we must confront the problem of algorithmic bias, which can skew recommendations and outcomes if not rigorously addressed (Baker & Hawn, 2021).

Your leadership must insist on transparency from vendors and establish clear, living policies for the ethical use of AI within your institution. The call for ethical considerations in AI development is echoed across the literature, emphasizing the need for robust frameworks and transparent practices to ensure equitable access and prevent algorithmic harm (Pata et al., 2022). This includes guidelines for student data privacy, academic integrity, and ensuring equitable access to high-quality tools for all students, regardless of socioeconomic status.

Cultivating an AI-Ready Culture: The Human Touch

This isn't just about implementing technology; it's about cultivating an AI-ready culture. This means creating psychological safety where educators feel empowered to experiment, learn, and even fail with AI tools, rather than fearing them. Provide ongoing, job-embedded professional learning that addresses real-world applications and concerns. As leaders, we must model this learning ourselves. We can’t expect our staff to embrace AI if we aren’t exploring it and demonstrating its utility in our own work. The crucial role of leadership in successfully driving technological adoption and fostering a culture of innovation is well established (Akiba & LeTendre, 2022).

The AI age isn't about technology replacing us; it's about technology empowering us to be more human, more strategic, and more impactful where it truly counts. It's an opportunity for leaders to focus on the truly essential: vision, relationships, empathy, and inspiring a new generation of learners ready for an evolving world. As I shared in Digital Leadership - don’t just manage the change; lead it.

Akiba, M., & LeTendre, G. (2022). The role of school leadership in technology adoption: A systematic review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(1), 3–32.

Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2021). The problem of algorithmic bias in educational data mining. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(1), 105–123.

Hwang, G. J., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2020). Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: Current trends and future directions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 1–11.

Pata, K., Lätt, M., Valgma, S., & Pata, P. (2022). Ethical frameworks for the use of artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1017–1043.

Tzafilkou, K., Tsiaousis, A., & Papanikolaou, K. A. (2023). A systematic review of AI applications in school administration and leadership. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100109.

Unlock the Learning Gap: The Power of WIN Time

Recently, on my podcast Unpacking the Backpack, I dove into the concept of "WIN Time," or "What I Need Time." This idea is a powerful pedagogical shift designed to empower students and personalize learning. It's an essential component of reimagining how schools function. So, what exactly is WIN Time? At its core, it's a dedicated, flexible block of time built into the school day where students receive targeted support or enrichment based on their individual academic needs. It moves away from a one-size-fits-all approach and instead asks the critical question: "What does this specific student need right now to succeed?". This is something we discuss in detail in Personalize. 

Imagine a traditional classroom setting. Some students grasp concepts quickly, while others struggle with foundational skills. In a typical lesson, both groups move forward at the same pace, often leaving one group bored and disengaged, and the other increasingly frustrated and left behind. WIN Time is designed precisely to bridge this gap. It's a structured mechanism for immediate intervention for those who need extra help, a challenging extension for those who are ready for more, and fundamentally, a space for students to take ownership of their learning journey.

It's important to stress that WIN Time isn't simply about remediation; it’s about personalization on a grand scale. It acknowledges that learning is not linear and that every student's path is unique. This means identifying specific academic gaps through timely data, offering opportunities for advanced study, or even providing time for students to pursue passion projects related to their curriculum.

The Educational Imperative: Why We Need WIN Time

Why is a structured intervention time so crucial in today's educational landscape? The fundamental argument is that we need to move beyond simply covering content and instead focus on ensuring mastery. Traditional models often push students forward regardless of their depth of understanding, leading to cumulative, unaddressed gaps that become increasingly difficult to close as students progress through grades. WIN Time directly addresses this by providing a mechanism for timely and specific intervention.

Consider the data on learning gaps. When students consistently struggle with a concept, and those struggles are not addressed immediately, the gap between what they know and what they need to know widens exponentially. This leads to decreased confidence, significant disengagement, and ultimately, a disservice to the learner. WIN Time allows educators to be proactive, identifying struggles early and providing immediate, targeted support. This practice is about developing a growth mindset and building resilient, self-aware learners, not just improving a standardized test score.

Furthermore, implementing this dedicated time promotes student agency. Instead of being passive recipients of information, students become active participants in identifying their needs and pursuing their learning goals. They learn to self-assess, advocate for themselves, understand precisely where they need help, and seek out appropriate resources. This skill—self-advocacy—is a critical life skill that extends far beyond the classroom walls.

Overcoming Implementation Challenges

Adopting a flexible block like WIN Time is not without its challenges. One of the primary hurdles schools face is scheduling. How do you carve out a 30-to-45-minute dedicated block in an already packed school day? This often requires a willingness to critically rethink traditional schedules, perhaps by adjusting bell times, reallocating existing advisory periods, or modifying the length of core subject blocks. It demands a high degree of collaboration among all staff members and a shared commitment to the philosophy behind personalized support.

Another significant challenge is data collection and diagnosis. Identifying student needs effectively requires robust, ongoing formative assessment practices. Teachers need reliable, up-to-the-minute data to accurately determine who needs intervention, who needs enrichment, and the specific areas that require attention. This means embracing a continuous cycle of assessment, rapid analysis, and responsive, targeted instruction. We must move beyond reliance on delayed, summative tests.

Finally, there's the question of staffing and resources. Who facilitates this time? What specific materials are needed? While teachers are ideally equipped to provide differentiated instruction within their own classrooms, there are opportunities to leverage support from specialists, counselors, or even trained peer mentors to contribute. The key is to organize and utilize all available resources efficiently to create a rich and supportive learning environment that maximizes the time.

Practical Applications: What WIN Time Looks Like

Now, let's look at the practical application. What does a successful WIN Time model actually look like in a school setting? Data is used to enhance the teaching and learning process through a variety of pathways:

• Teacher teams sharing learners: Students might be assigned to different "WIN groups" based on current academic performance and diagnostic data; these assignments must be fluid and change week to week.

• Station rotation: Read more HERE.
• Modified rotations: Read more HERE.
• Must-do / may-do: Read more HERE.
• Playlists: Read more HERE.
• Choice boards: Read more HERE.

Below you can see how the above strategies connect to RTI (Tier 2 and 3 suppport).

The true strength of this approach is its flexibility. It is not a rigid program but a dynamic framework that can and should be adapted to the unique context of each school, its population, and its curriculum structure.

The Transformative Potential

When implemented effectively, the results of this focused, personalized learning time can be truly transformative for student outcomes.

• Improved Academic Performance: By providing highly targeted support exactly when it's needed, students close academic gaps more quickly, leading to improved understanding and higher achievement across all subjects.
• Increased Student Engagement: When learning is personalized, relevant, and directly addresses a student's current challenge or interest, they are far more likely to be engaged and motivated. They feel seen, heard, and actively supported.
• Enhanced Self-Efficacy: As students repeatedly experience success through focused effort and take ownership of their learning path, their confidence and belief in their own ability to learn grow significantly.
• Development of Competencies: This protected time naturally develops and refines critical competencies like critical thinking, self-regulation, problem-solving, focused collaboration, and, most importantly, self-advocacy.

WIN Time is about more than making incremental improvements; it's about fundamentally rethinking what school can be. It challenges the traditional rigid model of education and moves us towards a more student-centered, agile, and responsive approach. It is a powerful structural commitment to equity, ensuring that every student, regardless of their starting point, has the dedicated time and support necessary to thrive. It’s not just "What I Need Time," it’s a commitment to a mastery-based educational model.

Scaling Innovation Through Agile Leadership

The traditional hierarchy—the "command and control" model where a leader dictates every 'how' is not just inefficient in today's knowledge economy; it is obsolete. In education, where the work is inherently complex, dynamic, and requires continuous adaptation, the path to sustained excellence demands a fundamental shift in how we lead. It’s time to move beyond managing schools like assembly lines and adopt the Agile Leadership mindset, which I recently discussed on my podcast Unpacking the Backpack.

Agile leadership is not a set of tools; it’s a commitment to a new organizational operating system. It recognizes that the person closest to the student—the educator—has the most accurate information and should be empowered to act on it. This transition is built on three core pillars: a radical mindset shift, the adoption of servant-based practices, and a focus on systemic organizational impact.

The Mindset Shift: From Control to Coaching

The greatest barrier to agility is a leader's resistance to relinquishing control, something that I address in great detail in Digital Leadership. Agile leadership flips the traditional organizational pyramid, transforming the leader from the chief decision-maker into the Chief Impediment Remover to become a servant leader.

Instead of focusing on Output ("Did you complete the five pages of the curriculum?") a truly agile school leader focuses on Outcomes ("Did completing that curriculum improve student mastery and critical thinking?"). The job is to constantly ask Why and ensure every team—from the grade level to the central office—is deeply connected to the ultimate goal: delivering maximum value to the student (Paige, 2011).

This transition requires leaders to embrace ambiguity and failure not as shortcomings, but as necessary data points. In a complex, disruptive world, we know the destination (student success), but the best route must be discovered. Leaders must actively model and celebrate "safe-to-fail" experimentation, treating innovative instructional trials as low-cost investments in learning (Wagstaff, 2021). The foundation for this is Psychological Safety—the belief that staff and students will not be penalized or humiliated for speaking up with ideas or mistakes (Edmondson, 2018). An agile leader's primary role is to establish this safety; without it, problems are hidden, and small mistakes become systemic crises.

Consider agile leadership as a lighthouse, providing the constant, unwavering vision and psychological safety needed for the journey. The team on the flexible raft represents self-organizing individuals who are empowered to quickly adapt and respond to the immediate, unpredictable challenges of the stormy sea (the current state of education). This illustrates that the agile leader's job is not to row, but to illuminate the path and ensure the vessel is structurally capable of navigating change.

Key Practices: Empowering the Self-Organizing Team

The mindset is the engine; the practices are the wheels that drive organizational change. The agile leader's day fundamentally changes, prioritizing coaching, alignment, and systems improvement.

1. Purpose-Driven Alignment

Agile leaders are the ultimate communicators of the Why. They use tools like Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) and SMART goals to cascade the organizational vision into measurable, actionable goals for every team and department. This continuous, clear communication ensures that an educator's daily lesson planning is directly linked to the school’s overarching strategic purpose. The leader facilitates regular, low-friction forums to share this vision, ensuring no team ever loses sight of the ultimate goal.

2. Nurturing Self-Organizing Teams

In an agile environment, the unit of delivery is the self-organizing, cross-functional team (grade-level or content-specific). An agile leader does not assign tasks; they define the problem space, such a gap in student learning or a need for a new resource and empower the team to figure out the solution. They decentralize decision-making, delegating full authority for process improvement and content delivery to the educators closest to the work. The leader steps in only to manage external roadblocks or conflicts that the team cannot resolve internally (Lee et al., 2016).

3. Institutionalizing Continuous Feedback

Agile is built on rapid feedback loops. Leaders institutionalize and protect crucial "inspect and adapt" mechanisms like the retrospective, committing to removing one systemic impediment the team identifies. They engage in leader standard work, which includes dedicated one-on-ones and "Gemba walks" (going to where the work is happening) to observe the system of work, the processes, not just the people, to provide timely, specific, and actionable feedback.

Systemic Impact: Optimizing the Flow of Value

The true power of agile leadership is realized when it scales innovation across the entire organization.

The ultimate enemy of agility is the organizational silo, which is often the wall between grade levels, departments, or central office functions. Agile leaders operate at the system level, shifting the focus from optimizing individual departments to optimizing the end-to-end flow of value to the student (Wong & Keng, 2024). They proactively break down these silos, championing cross-functional collaboration and redesigning the structure to mirror the value stream. This approach drives continuous improvement, transforming the organization itself into a product that is constantly refined based on feedback.

Agile leadership is not a methodology; it is a commitment to continuous learning, to empowering people, and to focusing relentlessly on student value. It requires courage, humility, and a fundamental belief that the people in our schools are best suited to decide how to achieve the educational outcomes we all seek. Leaders must make the clear choice: move from controlling to coaching, from predicting to adapting, and from measuring activity to celebrating impact.

Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Harvard Business Review.

Lee, Y., Warkentin, M., & Liu, C. (2016). Agile project management: A review and framework for future research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(3), 443–478.

Paige, D. D. (2011). “That sounded good!”: Using whole class choral reading to improve fluency. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 190–200.

Wagstaff, S. (2021). The agility shift: Leveraging agile principles for organizational transformation in education. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(1), 74-90.

Wong, S. Y., & Keng, N. S. (2024). Scaling agile in complex organizations: The role of transformational leadership and cross-functional teams. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(1), 121–143.

Leading from the Heart: How Vulnerability Drives Trust and Innovation

Recently, on my podcast, Unpacking the Backpack, I shared some thoughts on the importance of vulnerability as a leader.  Below, I take a deeper look at this concept. 

For way too long, we've been sold a bill of goods about what leadership looks like. The old-school playbook said a great leader is a superhero—unflappable, all-knowing, and always in control. They were taught to never show a crack in the armor, to project an image of perfection. This outdated ideal, however, is not just broken; it's actively sabotaging our efforts to build resilient, innovative teams. We’ve seen this play out in organizations worldwide, where a culture of fear and control stifles creativity and prevents people from taking the risks needed for growth.

What if the most powerful move you could make is to simply admit, "I don't know"? Or, "I messed that up"? Or even, "I need help"? This isn't about being weak. In fact, it's the exact opposite. True leadership is about having the courage to be seen for who you really are, flaws and all.  This isn't some fluffy "soft skill." It's a foundational shift in how we build trust,  innovate with purpose, and create a culture where people don't just survive, they thrive. 

Vulnerability Isn't Weakness; It’s a Superpower

Let's address the elephant in the room. The biggest misconception is that vulnerability is a sign of weakness. When people hear the word, their minds jump to emotional fragility or a lack of competence. The fear is that if you let your guard down, you’ll lose the respect of your team, and your authority will evaporate. That fear is a major roadblock, but it's built on a false premise.

Think about it: is it weak to stand in front of your people and say, "We've hit a wall here, and I don't have the perfect answer"? No way. That's a profound act of courage. It takes guts to be transparent about a challenge and even more guts to admit you don't have all the solutions. As Brené Brown, a trailblazer in this field, and other researchers have taught us, vulnerability involves "uncertainty, risk, and emotional exposure" (Fong, 2021). In a leadership context, it's about being willing to show up and be seen when you can't control the outcome. It’s telling your staff, "This change is a huge lift, and it’s going to take all of us. I can't do it alone." That’s not weakness; it's a declaration of shared purpose. It’s an act of courage because it requires you to be honest with yourself and your team about your limitations. You can’t build a strong foundation on a false front of perfection. Instead, you build it on the solid ground of authenticity. 

Building a Culture of Psychological Safety

So, why go through all this? Why risk showing your human side? Because the payoff is massive, and it directly impacts your team’s performance. When you lead with vulnerability, you create a powerful environment of psychological safety.

Psychological safety is a shared belief that a team is a safe place for interpersonal risk-taking (Edmondson, 1999). It’s a culture where people feel comfortable speaking up, asking questions, admitting mistakes, and sharing crazy ideas without fear of being shamed or punished. When a leader models vulnerability, they give everyone else permission to do the same. This isn't just my opinion; it’s backed by some of the most compelling research out there. Google’s Project Aristotle, for example, spent years analyzing hundreds of their teams to figure out what made them tick. The number one factor for team success wasn’t the skill of the individuals or their tenure; it was psychological safety. When you foster this kind of safety, you unlock innovation, boost problem-solving, and accelerate learning. How many amazing ideas have been lost because someone was too afraid to suggest them? Vulnerability is the key that unlocks that door.

Beyond psychological safety, leading with vulnerability builds authentic trust. You can't demand trust with a title; you have to earn it through consistent, honest behavior. When you're open about your struggles or your mistakes, you become relatable. Your people see you not as a distant authority figure but as a partner in the work. This creates a deeper sense of loyalty and commitment. They're more willing to go the extra mile for a leader they respect and trust. It also cultivates empathy, which is crucial for a modern workplace dealing with burnout and mental health challenges. Research by Nembhard and Edmondson (2006) shows that when leaders are perceived as vulnerable, it encourages employee voice and strengthens team effectiveness.

Actionable Steps: How to Start Small

How do you actually do this? It’s not a switch you can just flip. It's a muscle you have to build slowly and deliberately.

First, get real with yourself. What makes you feel vulnerable? Is it admitting you don't know an answer? Apologizing for a mistake? Asking for help? Once you pinpoint your triggers, you can start small.

A great next step is to model accountability. If you mess up, own it. Say, "I dropped the ball on that deadline, and I take full responsibility. Here’s what I learned, and here’s how we'll adjust." No excuses, no blame game. This is a powerful, low-risk way to show vulnerability. Another simple action is to ask for help. Instead of presenting a top-down plan, try saying, "I'm not sure what the best approach is here. What are your thoughts? I'd really value your input." This not only shows your human side but also empowers your team, making them feel like true partners. 

Finally, be a human being. Share a brief, non-work-related story. Maybe it's a challenge you're facing with a home project or a new hobby you're trying. It's about building genuine connection, not oversharing personal details.

Remember, this is about being purposeful. The goal isn't to air all your dirty laundry. It's to share enough to build connection and trust without making your staff uncomfortable. The litmus test should be simple: "Is this in service of the students we serve and our core mission?" If the answer is yes, you're on the right track. If not, you might be veering into oversharing territory.

The Path Forward

So, what’s your move? This isn't a one-and-done deal. Vulnerability in leadership is a continuous practice. It's about taking one small, intentional step at a time. Apologize for a minor error. Ask for help with a non-critical task. Share a moment of genuine uncertainty. Don't try to change everything overnight. Just take one small risk to be seen for who you are, not for who you think you're supposed to be.

You’ll likely find that instead of losing respect, you'll gain it. Your team won't see weakness; they'll see a fellow human being who has the courage to connect. Vulnerability is no longer a "nice to have" skill; it's a core competency of modern leadership. It's the key to unlocking trust, innovation, and a resilient culture that can weather any storm. Find one small way to be vulnerable this week. Maybe it's admitting a mistake, maybe it's asking for help, or maybe it’s simply saying, “I don't know, but let's figure it out together.” The most powerful leaders aren't the ones who pretend to be perfect; they're the ones who have the courage to be real.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

Fong, C. (2021). The benefits of leader vulnerability in times of crisis. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), 1-8.

Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966.

Purposeful Minutes, Powerful Learning

Recently, on my podcast Unpacking the Backpack, I shared some thoughts on maximizing instructional time.   Let's dive a little deeper.

Think about a typical school day. There's so much to fit in—lessons, activities, assessments, and, of course, the inevitable transitions, interruptions, and administrative tasks that eat away at our precious minutes. So, how do we make the most of every second we have with our students? Let's look at the "why," the "what," and the "how" of maximizing instructional time.

The "Why": Why Does Instructional Time Matter So Much?

First, let's get to the heart of it. Why is this even a big deal? Instructional time isn't just about covering curriculum; it's about student learning and success. When we use our time effectively, we're not just moving through a checklist; we're creating a rich, engaging, and productive learning environment. More time on task leads to deeper understanding, better retention, and ultimately, improved academic outcomes.

Think of it like this: a surgeon has a limited amount of time in an operating room. Every single action must be purposeful and efficient.

A teacher's classroom is similar. We have a set number of minutes, and every minute counts. Wasted time in the classroom isn't just a loss of minutes; it's a lost opportunity for a student to grasp a concept, practice a skill, or engage in a meaningful discussion.

So, the why is simple: maximizing instructional time is a direct pathway to better student learning. It allows us to personalize, provide targeted support to students who need it, and create space for creative and critical thinking that often gets overlooked when we're under time pressure.

The "What": What Exactly Are We Maximizing?

Now that we know why it's important, let's define what we're actually talking about. When we say "instructional time," we're not just referring to the time when you're standing in front of the class lecturing. We're talking about the total amount of time students are actively engaged in learning. This includes:

• Active instructional time: When you're directly teaching, explaining, or demonstrating.
• Guided practice: When students are working on tasks with your support and guidance.
• Independent practice: When students are working on their own to solidify their understanding.
• Meaningful transitions: The time between activities, when students are moving from one task to the next in a purposeful way.

The goal isn't just to fill every moment; it's to fill it with purposeful, high-quality, and meaningful learning activities. This means minimizing the "dead time" in a classroom—the time spent on non-instructional tasks like waiting for students to settle down, passing out papers, or dealing with behavioral disruptions.

The "How": Practical Strategies for Your Classroom

Okay, here's the part you've been waiting for. How do we actually do this? I've broken down some of the most effective strategies into a few key areas.

1. The Art of the Efficient Beginning

The first few minutes of class can set the tone for the entire period. Instead of using this time for routine tasks, turn it into a learning opportunity.

• Implement a "Do Now" or Bell Ringer: As soon as students enter the classroom, they should have a short, purposeful task waiting for them on the board or their desk. This could be a quick review question, a journal prompt, or a problem to solve. This gets their brains in "learning mode" immediately and buys you time to take attendance or handle administrative tasks without losing instructional time.
• Establish a Clear Routine: Students thrive on routine. When they know exactly what to do when they enter the classroom, the process becomes automatic. A simple routine like "hang up your backpack, grab your notebook, and start the 'Do Now'" can save several minutes every single day.

2. Streamlining Transitions

Transitions are a notorious time-waster in many classrooms. A 3-minute transition between activities can easily turn into 10 minutes if not managed properly.

• Use Signals and Cues: Instead of yelling over a noisy class, use a non-verbal signal like a hand clap, a specific bell sound, or turning the lights on and off. Practice these signals until they become second nature.
• "Chunk" Your Transitions: Break down the transition into small, manageable steps. Instead of saying, "Okay, everyone, put your books away, get out your science binders, and move to your lab groups," break it down: "Step 1: Put your books away." "Step 2: Take out your science binders." This reduces cognitive load and helps students stay on track.
• Prepare in Advance: Have all your materials ready before the students arrive. Have handouts stacked, lab equipment set up, or links for digital resources pre-loaded. The less time you spend fumbling for materials, the more time you have for instruction.

3. Purposeful Planning and Pacing

Effective time management starts long before students enter the classroom. It begins with your lesson plan.

• Over-plan, but Don't Over-teach: Plan for more activities than you think you'll have time for. This ensures you always have a meaningful task ready, even if you finish a section early. However, be prepared to adjust and cut things out if a topic requires more time. The goal isn't to race through the curriculum; it's to ensure understanding.
• Use a Timer: A timer can be a powerful tool for both you and your students. Use it to set a time limit for a group discussion, an independent practice task, or a writing exercise. This creates a sense of urgency and helps everyone stay focused. It also helps you, the teacher, from getting bogged down in one part of the lesson.
• Integrate Assessments: Don't see assessments as a separate, time-consuming task. Build them into your lessons. Quick checks for understanding, like a one-minute reflection or a quick-write, provide you with valuable feedback while keeping the lesson moving.

4. Classroom Management as Time Management

Behavioral disruptions are a massive drain on instructional time. A well-managed classroom is an efficient classroom.

• Clear Expectations and Consequences: From day one, be crystal clear about your expectations for behavior. When students know what's expected, they're more likely to meet those expectations. When a rule is broken, have a consistent and predictable consequence. This minimizes the time spent on reacting to misbehavior.
• Address Issues Privately and Proactively: Minor behavioral issues can often be addressed with a quiet word or a non-verbal cue. The less time you spend having a public confrontation, the more time you have for teaching.
• Build Relationships: Students are more likely to stay engaged and on task when they feel a positive connection with you. Take the time to get to know your students. When they feel respected and cared for, they are more likely to respect the classroom and the learning process.

5. Leveraging Technology and Tools

As I shared in Digital Leadership, technology, when used wisely, can be a huge time-saver.

• Digital Tools for Handouts: Instead of physically passing out papers, use a digital platform like Google Classroom, Canvas, or Microsoft Teams to share documents. This eliminates the time spent distributing and collecting papers.
• Pre-recorded Explanations: For complex concepts, consider recording a short video explanation for students to watch before class. This "flipped classroom" model allows you to use class time for hands-on activities, discussions, and addressing specific questions, rather than just lecturing.
• Use Collaborative Platforms: Tools like Padlet or Linoit allow multiple students to contribute simultaneously, making group work and brainstorming sessions far more efficient than traditional methods.

6. The Power of "Small Talk"

Finally, don't underestimate the power of using small, seemingly inconsequential moments for learning.

• Exit Tickets: The last few minutes of class are often wasted. Use this time for a quick "exit ticket." It could be a single question on a sticky note, a summary of the main idea, or a question they still have. This provides you with valuable data and keeps students engaged until the very end.
• The "One Last Thing" Moment: As students are packing up, seize the opportunity to reinforce a key concept or ask a thought-provoking question related to the day's lesson. This keeps learning at the forefront, even during the final moments.

This isn't just a teacher's job; it's a school-wide effort. Leaders, from principals to department heads, play a critical role in creating an environment where maximizing instructional time is not only possible but prioritized. A great leader can protect their teachers' time by first looking at the school's own practices. This means scrutinizing the schedule to reduce unnecessary interruptions and staggering student pull-outs for services so they don't always happen during core instructional periods. It also involves critically evaluating meetings and administrative tasks. Are all meetings necessary? Can some information be shared in a quick email? Reducing the burden of paperwork and non-instructional duties directly gives teachers back the most valuable resource they have: time to plan, prepare, and reflect on their lessons.

Beyond protecting time, leaders can empower teachers with the tools and professional development needed for efficiency. This could be providing training on new classroom management techniques that reduce behavioral disruptions or offering workshops on using technology to streamline lesson delivery. A supportive leader models good time management and sets a clear school-wide expectation that every minute in the classroom is valuable. By fostering a culture that values efficiency, and by proactively removing systemic barriers, leaders can make a powerful statement that student learning is the top priority, and they will do everything in their power to help their teachers make the most of every second.

Maximizing instructional time isn't about rushing through the day. It's about being intentional and purposeful with every single minute. It's about creating a smooth, predictable, and engaging learning environment where students can truly thrive. By implementing just a few of these strategies, you can reclaim minutes that turn into hours, and those hours translate into deeper learning and greater success for your students.

Shifting the Narrative From "We Can't" to "How Can We?"

Change is hard. Actually, it is really hard. Not only have I written extensively about this fact for years, but I also suspect that everyone reading this post has had a similar experience.  One main reason for this is a tendency to focus on things we cannot control, which redirects energy to the wrong things. The end result is a thought process about why we can’t change or improve our practice, something I discussed in detail recently on my podcast, Unpacking the Backpack. Change can and will happen if we focus on the right question. 

A pervasive mindset of "we can't" often hinders progress. It's a phrase that stifles innovation and dismisses new ideas before they even have a chance to take root. To genuinely prepare students for a disruptive world, both school leaders and teachers must make a fundamental shift: from dwelling on limitations to proactively asking, "How can we?" This isn't just about forced optimism; it's a strategic framework for finding solutions, leveraging collective strength, and fostering a culture of continuous learning.

The Leader's Role: Cultivating a Solutions-Oriented Culture

A leader's response to a challenge sets the tone for the entire school. Instead of listing reasons why a new initiative is impossible—"We can't do that because we don't have the time or resources"—an effective leader asks, "How can we achieve this goal given our current constraints?" This subtle change in language shifts the focus from limitations to possibilities. By modeling this approach, leaders empower teachers and show that their professional expertise is valued. This leadership style builds a sense of shared ownership and trust. As noted by Leithwood et al. (2004), leaders who promote a clear vision and provide genuine support for their staff are critical to creating a positive school culture and significantly improving school effectiveness. They transform the conversation from a list of barriers into a collaborative problem-solving session where everyone is an active participant in finding a way forward.

The Teacher's Role: From Data Judgment to Growth Roadmap

For teachers, embracing the "how can we?" mindset often means reframing the purpose of student data. Instead of viewing it as a judgment on their teaching—"I can't get everyone to mastery"—they see it as a roadmap for growth. For example, when faced with widespread learning gaps, a teacher can shift the question to, "How can we use diagnostic data to adjust our initial instruction and prevent these gaps from widening?" This approach encourages teachers to dive deep into student work and assessment results, pinpointing specific areas of need and then collaboratively designing targeted interventions. Marzano, Pickering, and Pollock (2001) demonstrated that data-informed instructional strategies, applied with fidelity, have a profound impact on student achievement. This isn't about working harder; it's about working smarter, using evidence to guide decisions and refine practices.

The Collective Effort: Collaboration as a Catalyst for Change

The "how can we?" philosophy thrives in a strong Professional Learning Community (PLC). Instead of a teacher lamenting, "I can't seem to reach this student," a PLC asks, "How can we, as a team, pool our expertise and resources to ensure this student succeeds?" This collective approach acknowledges that a single teacher shouldn't have to solve every challenge alone. When teachers regularly collaborate to analyze student work and share successful strategies, the group's collective intelligence becomes a powerful engine for improvement. Effective PLCs focused on learning, rather than simply on teaching, develop a shared responsibility for student outcomes. This collaborative environment transforms individual struggles into shared challenges, encouraging a spirit of teamwork and innovation that can tackle even the most persistent problems.

The Path Forward: A Commitment to Iteration and Resilience

Cultivating a "how can we?" culture requires a commitment to continuous learning and iterative improvement, something I discuss in detail in Digital Leadership. It accepts that not every solution will be perfect on the first try. When an initiative faces initial difficulties, the mindset shifts from "It didn't work" to "How can we refine this approach based on what we've learned?"

This resilience, combined with a willingness to experiment and reflect, is foundational to genuine progress. Black and Wiliam (1998) famously demonstrated the power of formative assessment and feedback in improving student learning, highlighting that continuous adjustment based on evidence is key. By embracing this ethos of inquiry, leaders and teachers can unlock an unprecedented potential for growth, transforming their school community into a place where student success isn't just a hope, but a systematic outcome.

Shifting from "we can't" to "how can we?" isn't a silver bullet, but it is the essential mindset for navigating the complexities of education today. It's about empowering every member of the school community to be an active agent of change, fostering innovation, and ultimately, building a school where student success is not just hoped for, but systematically engineered.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership Project. The Wallace Foundation. 

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 

Strong, M. (2009). Effective teacher induction and mentoring programs: A review of research literature and implications for policy. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 173-201.

Moving Beyond the Leadership Checklist

Leading for impact isn't about implementing a shiny new initiative or checking off boxes on an observation form. It’s about developing a culture of meaningful change where the learning is deep and the outcomes are tangible. As leaders, our role isn't just to manage; it's to model, inspire, and empower others to do their best work. This is how we move from simply being present to truly making a difference.  Recently, on Unpacking the Backpack, I shared some thoughts on the topic. Listen on Spotify or wherever you access your favorite podcasts. Below are some expanded reflections, along with relevant research.

Many leaders fall into the trap of focusing on compliance and control, but this approach stifles innovation and disempowers staff. True impact comes from a commitment to people, pedagogy, intentionality, and accountability. We need to shift our mindset from "What do I need to do?" to "How can I help others succeed?" This means building strong relationships, building trust, and creating an environment where risks are welcomed and mistakes are seen as learning opportunities.

Checklists can be a great tool for getting things done, but driving meaningful, positive change rather than just managing tasks should be the ultimate goal. It starts with a clear vision and purpose, defining what success truly looks like and communicating that "why" to everyone involved. Impactful leaders are also deeply self-aware and emotionally intelligent, understanding their strengths, managing their emotions, and connecting empathetically with their teams. They build a culture of trust and psychological safety, fostering open communication and empowering others through effective delegation, coaching, and genuine recognition.

Ultimately, leading for impact requires continuous learning and adaptability in a changing world, seeing setbacks as opportunities for growth. It's about focusing relentlessly on results and accountability, using data to inform decisions and holding both yourself and others responsible for achieving shared goals. By consistently leading with integrity, resilience, and passion, you inspire action and create a ripple effect of positive change that extends far beyond your immediate team.

In my experience, effective leaders for impact are lead learners. They are unafraid to explore new ideas, experiment with technology, and share their own learning journey. This vulnerability builds credibility and shows our staff that we are all in this together. Research by Fullan (2014) highlights that moral purpose—the commitment to making a difference in the lives of students—is a key driver of effective leadership. It's the "why" that fuels the "what." This aligns with the findings of Leithwood et al. (2004), who found that leadership has a significant, albeit indirect, effect on student learning.

Leading for impact also requires us to get out of our offices and into the classrooms. We must be visible, engaged, and present to truly understand the needs of our school community. This isn't about "gotcha" moments; it's about being a resource, a coach, and a supporter. It’s about asking probing questions and co-constructing solutions. When we do this, we empower our teachers and students to become agents of their own growth, a concept reinforced by Robinson et al. (2009), who emphasized the importance of instructional leadership that is focused on what happens in the classroom. This is the essence of my work on Digital Leadership (Sheninger, 2019) – using our platforms not just to manage but to inspire and connect.

Below is a list of thirteen (13) specific actions I took as a principal to be a more impactful leader:

• Five (5) learning walks a day by each building administrator for non-evaluative feedback
• Collecting assessments instead of lesson plans two weeks in the future
• Creating an equitable grading philosophy and holding staff accountable to it
• Three (3) unannounced formal observations for every teacher 
• Development of shared norms for every lesson (standards-aligned learning targets, relevance, high-effect strategies, rigorous questioning/tasks, closure)
• Creation of quarterly benchmarks aligned to standards and standardized tests
• Dedicated PLC time connected to benchmarks and common formative assessments (CFA’s)
• Monthly principal’s report sharing teacher successes and building capacity (read more HERE)
• Flipped our faculty meetings where agenda items were pushed out for feedback, comments, and additions using Google Classroom and discussed asynchronously. Staff meeting time was then focused on one (1) question: How do we improve learning for our students?
• Transparent action plans for our building that had quantifiable metrics to support building goals, where progress and expectations were reviewed each month.
• Creation of a steering committee to elicit feedback from staff and students on how we could improve school culture and achievement.
• I led professional learning after school to model. 
• Admin PLC to analyze walk-through data and present feedback at faculty meetings (this was done to model effective PLC's for our staff)

Leading for impact is a continuous journey. It’s about consistently reflecting on our practices and asking ourselves, “Is this truly serving our students?” As Hattie (2009) reminds us, the goal is to see learning through the eyes of the student. By focusing on people, embracing a growth mindset, and staying connected to our purpose, we can move beyond simply managing to truly leading for lasting impact.

Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: A moral imperative. Corwin Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation.

Robinson, V. M. J., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. New Zealand Ministry of Education.

Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times (2nd Edition). Corwin Press.

Your Mindset is Your Masterpiece

Your mindset isn't just a perspective; it's the invisible architect of your reality. It determines not what you see, but how you interpret and act upon it, ultimately shaping your experiences, your resilience, and your growth potential. Cultivate it wisely, for it holds the key to unlocking everything you aspire to be. Recently, on Unpacking the Backpack, I shared some thoughts on the topic after revisiting a blog post I wrote in 2018. Listen on Spotify or wherever you access your favorite podcasts. Below are some expanded thoughts on the topic, along with relevant research.

In my years working with educators and leaders, I’ve consistently observed a fundamental truth: our beliefs are powerful architects of our experiences. What we deeply hold to be true, whether consciously or unconsciously, significantly influences our actions, perceptions, and ultimately, the outcomes we achieve. This isn't some abstract philosophical concept; it's a tangible force that shapes everything from classroom culture to organizational success. Understanding and harnessing the power of belief is crucial for anyone striving to create positive change.

Think about the concept of self-efficacy, an individual's belief in their capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments (Bandura, 1977). Research has consistently shown a strong correlation between a teacher's self-efficacy and their effectiveness in the classroom, impacting student achievement and motivation (Ross, 1998). If an educator believes they can reach even the most challenging students, their approach, persistence, and ultimately, their results are likely to reflect that conviction. Conversely, a lack of belief can create a self-fulfilling prophecy, limiting potential before it's even explored.

This principle extends beyond individual capabilities to encompass our beliefs about others and our environments. Consider the Pygmalion effect, where higher expectations lead to an increase in performance (Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1968). While the original study has faced some methodological critiques, the underlying principle remains powerful: our beliefs about the potential of those around us can significantly influence their growth and development. As leaders, our beliefs about our teams, our students, and our communities set the stage for what is possible.

The impact of belief also manifests in how we interpret challenges and setbacks. A growth mindset, as popularized by Dweck (2006), posits that individuals who believe their abilities can be developed through dedication and hard work tend to persevere through difficulties, view failures as learning opportunities, and ultimately achieve greater success. This contrasts with a fixed mindset, where abilities are seen as innate and unchangeable, often leading to avoidance of challenges and a sense of helplessness in the face of obstacles. Cultivating a belief in our capacity for growth and adaptation is essential in today's rapidly evolving educational landscape.

Our collective beliefs shape organizational culture. If a school community believes in collaboration, innovation, and continuous improvement, those values will permeate the daily interactions, decision-making processes, and overall climate. Conversely, beliefs rooted in scarcity, blame, or resistance to change can stifle progress and create a toxic environment. Leaders play a critical role in shaping these collective beliefs through their communication, actions, and the stories they amplify (Schein, 2010). By intentionally fostering beliefs that align with our vision for the future, we can cultivate more resilient, effective, and thriving organizations.

Reflecting on your own practices, I encourage you to consider the underlying beliefs that drive your decisions and interactions. What do you truly believe is possible for your students, your colleagues, and yourself? Are there any limiting beliefs holding you back from reaching your full potential or fostering the growth of those around you? Take some time this week to critically examine your internal narratives and identify one belief you can actively work to shift towards a more empowering and growth-oriented perspective. The power to shape your reality truly begins within. This can result in a reformed mindset, which becomes your masterpiece.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House. 

Ross, J. A. (1998). Antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 7, pp. 49-73). JAI Press.

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. 

The Art of Adaptation: Navigating and Justifying Change

Justifying change isn't just about presenting an idea; it's about building the bridge from current challenges to future possibilities, making the journey clear and compelling for everyone involved. Recently, on Unpacking the Backpack, I shared some thoughts on the topic after revisiting a blog post I wrote in 2024. Listen on Spotify or wherever you access your favorite podcasts. Below are some expanded thoughts on the topic, along with relevant research.

Change is a constant in education, driven by evolving student needs, new pedagogical research, technological advancements, and shifting societal expectations. Justifying these changes effectively within a school or district requires a clear articulation of the "why," backed by evidence, and a commitment to inclusive communication. When stakeholders, from teachers and parents to students and community members, understand the rationale and benefits, resistance can transform into enthusiastic support.

The Imperative for Change 

In a disruptive world, change is a constant. New research emerges on how children learn best, technology offers innovative teaching tools, and societal demands require schools to prepare students for an ever-changing world. For instance, the shift towards personalized learning into the curriculum isn't arbitrary; it's a response to research indicating better student outcomes (Durlak et al., 2011). Ignoring these shifts can lead to stagnant educational practices that fail to serve students effectively, potentially leaving them unprepared for future challenges (Fullan, 2015).

Building a Data-Enhanced Justification

Effective justification for change in K-12 relies heavily on data and evidence. This isn't just about standardized test scores; it encompasses a broader range of qualitative and quantitative indicators. For example, suppose a school is considering a new literacy program, presenting data on current reading comprehension levels. In that case, student engagement in reading or teacher feedback on existing resources provides a strong case. A decline in student motivation or an increase in behavioral issues may justify a new approach to classroom management or professional learning that focuses on engagement.

Benchmarking against successful schools or districts can also provide powerful evidence. If a new teaching methodology has significantly improved student outcomes in similar settings, this data can be compelling. Educational leaders often employ action research or pilot programs to gather localized data, demonstrating the potential impact of a change before implementing it more widely (Mills, 2018).

So why am I suggesting a move away from a data-driven mindset? Data-enhanced change recognizes that while data provides crucial insights, human judgment, experience, and qualitative factors are equally vital for successful implementation, fostering a more nuanced and adaptable approach. Unlike purely data-driven change, which can sometimes overlook contextual complexities and human elements, data-enhanced change integrates quantitative evidence with stakeholder input and practical wisdom to guide decisions.

Communicating the Vision and Benefits

Once the need for change is established, it's crucial to articulate a clear vision of the improved future state and the tangible benefits it will bring to students, staff, and the wider school community. For instance, if a district is moving to a new grading system, the communication should explain how it will provide more accurate feedback to students and parents, reduce teacher workload, or better reflect student mastery. For teachers, the benefits might include more effective teaching tools, reduced stress, or enhanced professional learning opportunities. For parents, it could be clearer communication about student progress or improved safety protocols. 

As I shared in Digital Leadership, active and transparent communication, including town hall meetings, dedicated websites, and regular updates, is paramount. Addressing potential anxieties and providing professional learning opportunities for staff are essential to mitigating resistance and fostering a sense of shared purpose (DuFour & DuFour, 2012).

Overcoming Resistance and Building Embracement 

Resistance to change often stems from comfort with the familiar, concerns about increased workload, or skepticism about the benefits. Acknowledging these concerns openly and creating channels for genuine feedback are critical. Engaging stakeholders in the change process itself significantly increases embracement. This could involve forming committees with teacher and parent representation, piloting new programs in a few classrooms before scaling, or providing ample training and support. Empowering "change champions" – respected teachers or staff members who embrace the new initiative – can also be highly effective in influencing peers (Kotter, 2012). By developing a collaborative environment where voices are heard and concerns are addressed, leaders can transform potential obstacles into opportunities for collective growth and improved student learning.

Justifying change is crucial for growth, driven by evolving student needs, research, and technology. This requires a data-enhanced approach that combines evidence with human judgment, clearly articulating the vision and benefits to stakeholders. By prioritizing open communication and active engagement, educators can transform resistance into widespread support for necessary reforms.

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432.

DuFour, R., & DuFour, R. (2012). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.

Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.

Future-Proofing Education: Why the AWS Imagine Conference is a Must-Attend for School Leaders

I remember when I got my first Blackberry phone in 2007. Things sure have changed a great deal since then. The pace of change in our world is relentless, and education is no exception. As leaders, we are constantly tasked with preparing learners for a future that is volatile, uncertain, and complex. I share the following in Disruptive Thinking in Our Classrooms:

“To prepare students for the present and future they need to become disruptive thinkers where they can replace conventional ideas with innovative solutions to authentic problems.”

Sticking to the status quo is no longer a viable strategy; it’s a recipe for irrelevance. The real question we must ask ourselves is not if we should innovate, but how we can do so effectively to create future-ready schools in a cloud-based world? That’s why I’m urging every forward-thinking leader to attend the AWS Imagine Conference in Chicago July 29-20, 2025. Best of all, it’s FREE! Below are some important facts:

• The event will be in-person, in Chicago. 
• There is no cost to attend. 
• Registrations must be made with a business email (i.e. .edu, .gov, or .org). 
• You can register to attend HERE.

I am grateful that AWS partnered with me on this sponsored post to share about this game-changing event. 

This isn't just another tech conference. It's a critical gathering for leaders focused on the strategic work of genuine transformation. One of the core themes, "future-proof your organization," gets to the heart of what we do. This is about more than just buying new devices; it's about fundamentally rethinking our operating models. Researchers define digital transformation as a holistic process that involves changes to an organization's core, its processes, and its service models, all triggered by new technology (Mergel et al., 2019). The Imagine Conference provides a roadmap for this deep, structural work, moving beyond buzzwords to showcase real-world strategies from public sector and education leaders who are successfully navigating this path.

However, the most powerful technology is useless if it isn’t embraced by the people it’s meant to serve, something I address in great detail in Digital Leadership. The best-laid plans for innovation often fail at the human level. This is why the conference's focus on aligning people, processes, and cloud-based technology is so vital. It acknowledges a truth I’ve seen throughout my career: successful implementation hinges on embracement. Research on digital acceptance consistently shows that for any new tool to be adopted, users must perceive it as both useful and easy to use (Al-Emran et al., 2018). The sessions and hands-on demos at Imagine are designed to help us lead this change, providing the insights needed to create a culture where innovation is not just mandated, but welcomed.

Ultimately, leading this shift is our greatest challenge. Meaningful educational change is a complex, dynamic process that requires more than a vision; it requires a deep understanding of the mechanics of implementation and the culture of schools (Fullan, 2007). The AWS Imagine Conference is an unparalleled opportunity to connect with peers, learn from experts, and gain the practical knowledge needed to lead this charge effectively, especially when it comes to cloud-based technology. It’s where we can move from abstract ideas to concrete action plans.

If you are serious about leading change that matters, this is an event you can't afford to miss. Connect there and work together to build the future of learning for all students. 

Learn more about the event HERE.

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Students’ perceptions of using m-learning for knowledge sharing: A structural equation modeling approach. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 10(3), 263–279.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385.