Compliance vs Engagement

One of the best aspects of the work my team and I at Aspire Change EDU do is getting into leaders as part of the coaching process.  During this time, we begin to collect qualitative evidence aligned with growth opportunities that they have set during initial meetings.  No matter where our travels take us, one of the most common areas districts and schools want to improve is shifting from compliance to student engagement. Truth be told, from my lens, this is something that most systems would benefit from if learning is the goal. Let’s begin to differentiate the two. 

Compliance and engagement are two concepts in the classroom, which I dive into in Disruptive Thinking in Our Classrooms. Compliance refers to following rules or expectations without necessarily understanding or internalizing the reasons behind them. It's often driven by external motivations like avoiding punishment or receiving rewards. Below are some characteristics and examples:

• External or limited motivation: Students may comply to avoid punishment or receive awards. In Drive, Dan Pink refers to these as “carrots & sticks” and “if-then” rewards that are extrinsic in nature.
• Passive consumption and participation: Students may simply do what they are told without active involvement. Examples include taking notes, listening to lectures, watching videos, and popcorn or teacher-led reading.  Other passive examples include paying attention while only a few students respond to verbal questions and sitting at desks while one student is at the board or interactive screen. Keep in mind there is no such thing as passive learning. 
• Superficial understanding: Compliance often indicates a basic understanding of the task but not necessarily a deeper grasp of the subject matter or concepts. These are often associated with questions that are mostly depth of knowledge (DOK) 1 or the foundational level of Bloom’s Taxonomy (who, what, where, when).

Engagement, on the other hand, involves being actively involved, interested, and enthusiastic about learning. It's fueled by intrinsic motivation and often leads to a deeper understanding of the subject matter. While both compliance and engagement may result in completing tasks, the underlying motivations and levels of involvement are vastly different. Here are some practical examples that can be aligned with standards to engage students in the classroom:

• Student voice: everyone in class responds to questions using whiteboards, dry-erase surfaces, Post-its, or technology.
• Turn & talk to spark discourse 
• I do, we do, you do
• Relevant application
• Scaffolded questions & tasks to provide an appropriate amount of challenge (check out the Relevant Thinking Framework) 
• Choice activities (must-do/may-do, choice boards, playlists - learn more in Personalize)
• Differentiation (i.e., data-enhanced rotations)
• Cooperative learning
• Meaningful extension activities to maximize time
• Success criteria & rubrics when students are completing projects or writing tasks

Think of a classroom like a garden. Compliance is like planting seeds without tending to them. The seeds may sprout, but they won't grow into healthy plants without proper care. Engagement is like carefully tending to the garden, watering the plants, and providing sunlight. These plants will thrive and produce beautiful flowers.

Similarly, in a classroom, compliance may result in students completing tasks, but they may not truly understand the material or be able to apply it. Engagement involves active participation, asking questions, and seeking deeper understanding. This approach leads to students who are more likely to thrive academically and develop a genuine love for learning. That’s the goal, right?